Literature DB >> 22593204

Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Joseph G Desloge1, Charlotte M Reed, Louis D Braida, Zachary D Perez, Lorraine A Delhorne.   

Abstract

Functional simulation of sensorineural hearing impairment is an important research tool that can elucidate the nature of hearing impairments and suggest or eliminate compensatory signal-processing schemes. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the capability of an audibility-based functional simulation of hearing loss to reproduce the auditory-filter characteristics of listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. The hearing-loss simulation used either threshold-elevating noise alone or a combination of threshold-elevating noise and multiband expansion to reproduce the audibility-based characteristics of the loss (including detection thresholds, dynamic range, and loudness recruitment). The hearing losses of 10 listeners with bilateral, mild-to-severe hearing loss were simulated in 10 corresponding groups of 3 age-matched normal-hearing listeners. Frequency selectivity was measured using a notched-noise masking paradigm at five probe frequencies in the range of 250 to 4000 Hz with a fixed probe level of either 70 dB SPL or 8 dB SL (whichever was greater) and probe duration of 200 ms. The hearing-loss simulation reproduced the absolute thresholds of individual hearing-impaired listeners with an average root-mean-squared (RMS) difference of 2.2 dB and the notched-noise masked thresholds with an RMS difference of 5.6 dB. A rounded-exponential model of the notched-noise data was used to estimate equivalent rectangular bandwidths and slopes of the auditory filters. For some subjects and probe frequencies, the simulations were accurate in reproducing the auditory-filter characteristics of the hearing-impaired listeners. In other cases, however, the simulations underestimated the magnitude of the auditory bandwidths for the hearing-impaired listeners, which suggests the possibility of suprathreshold deficits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22593204      PMCID: PMC4040846          DOI: 10.1177/1084713812445510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  45 in total

1.  Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism.

Authors:  B C Moore; D A Vickers; C J Plack; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea.

Authors:  B C Moore; M Huss; D A Vickers; B R Glasberg; J I Alcántara
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2000-08

3.  Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A comparative study of S-N o and E-N- o .

Authors:  C M Reed; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Age-related primary cochlear neuronal degeneration in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Chadi A Makary; Jennifer Shin; Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-12

8.  Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment.

Authors:  Richard J Baker; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Adding insult to injury: cochlear nerve degeneration after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Sharon G Kujawa; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  8 in total

1.  Consonant identification using temporal fine structure and recovered envelope cues.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Charlotte M Reed; Joseph G Desloge; Louis D Braida; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Frequency selectivity in macaque monkeys measured using a notched-noise method.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Margit E Dylla; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne; Timothy J Villabona
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Tone-burst auditory brainstem response wave V latencies in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Judy Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Kendra K Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Kanae Nishi; Andrea C Trevino; Lydia Rosado Rogers; Paula García; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Changes in audiometric threshold and frequency selectivity correlate with cochlear histopathology in macaque monkeys with permanent noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Chase A Mackey; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Rate Discrimination Training May Partially Restore Temporal Processing Abilities from Age-Related Deficits.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Lindsay DeVries; Edward Smith; Matthew J Goupell; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-10

8.  Factors Underlying Individual Differences in Speech-Recognition Threshold (SRT) in Noise Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Larry E Humes
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.750

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.