Literature DB >> 10573892

Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism.

B C Moore1, D A Vickers, C J Plack, A J Oxenham.   

Abstract

The active mechanism in the cochlea is thought to depend on the integrity of the outer hair cells (OHCs). Cochlear hearing loss is usually associated with damage to both inner hair cells (IHCs) and OHCs, with the latter resulting in a reduction in or complete loss of the function of the active mechanism. It is believed that the active mechanism contributes to the sharpness of tuning on the basilar membrane (BM) and is also responsible for compressive input-output functions on the BM. Hence, one would expect a close relationship between measures of sharpness of tuning and measures of compression. This idea was tested by comparing three different measures of the status of the active mechanism, at center frequencies of 2, 4, and 6 kHz, using subjects with normal hearing, with unilateral or highly asymmetric cochlear hearing loss, and with bilateral loss. The first measure, HLOHC, was an indirect measure of the amount of the hearing loss attributable to OHC damage; this was based on loudness matches between the two ears of subjects with unilateral hearing loss and was derived using a loudness model. The second measure was the equivalent rectangular bandwidth (ERB) of the auditory filter, which was estimated using the notched-noise method. The third measure was based on the slopes of growth-of-masking functions obtained in forward masking. The ratio of slopes for a masker centered well below the signal frequency and a masker centered at the signal frequency gives a measure of BM compression at the place corresponding to the signal frequency; a ratio close to 1 indicates little or no compression, while ratios less than 1 indicate that compression is occurring at the signal place. Generally, the results showed the expected pattern. The ERB tended to increase with increasing HLOHC. The ratio of the forward-masking slopes increased from about 0.3 to about 1 as HLOHC increased from 0 to 55 dB. The ratio of the slopes was highly correlated with the ERB (r = 0.92), indicating that the sharpness of the auditory filter decreases as the compression on the BM decreases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10573892     DOI: 10.1121/1.428133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  46 in total

1.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

2.  Forward masking additivity and auditory compression at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Catherine G O'Hanlon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

3.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

4.  Effects of background noise level on behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Using individual differences to test the role of temporal and place cues in coding frequency modulation.

Authors:  Kelly L Whiteford; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

7.  Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; John B Issa; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

8.  Correction of the peripheral spatiotemporal response pattern: a potential new signal-processing strategy.

Authors:  Lu-Feng Shi; Laurel H Carney; Karen A Doherty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Reliability and Repeatability of the Speech Cue Profile.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Richard Wright; Frederick Gallun; Paul Reinhart
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.