Literature DB >> 21682411

Temporal modulation transfer functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Joseph G Desloge1, Charlotte M Reed, Louis D Braida, Zachary D Perez, Lorraine A Delhorne.   

Abstract

A functional simulation of hearing loss was evaluated in its ability to reproduce the temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs) for nine listeners with mild to profound sensorineural hearing loss. Each hearing loss was simulated in a group of three age-matched normal-hearing listeners through spectrally shaped masking noise or a combination of masking noise and multiband expansion. TMTFs were measured for both groups of listeners using a broadband noise carrier as a function of modulation rate in the range 2 to 1024 Hz. The TMTFs were fit with a lowpass filter function that provided estimates of overall modulation-depth sensitivity and modulation cutoff frequency. Although the simulations were capable of accurately reproducing the threshold elevations of the hearing-impaired listeners, they were not successful in reproducing the TMTFs. On average, the simulations resulted in lower sensitivity and higher cutoff frequency than were observed in the TMTFs of the hearing-impaired listeners. Discrepancies in performance between listeners with real and simulated hearing loss are possibly related to inaccuracies in the simulation of recruitment.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21682411      PMCID: PMC3135146          DOI: 10.1121/1.3583550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  45 in total

1.  Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Ken W Grant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Modulation rate detection and discrimination by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  K W Grant; V Summers; M R Leek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.

Authors:  S P Bacon; J M Opie; D Y Montoya
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effects of slow- and fast-acting compression on the detection of gaps in narrow bands of noise.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg; J I Alcántara; S Launer; V Kuehnel
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  2001-12

6.  Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Erwin L J George; Joost M Festen; Tammo Houtgast
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  B C Moore; B R Glasberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Mathieu Husson; Marine Ardoint; Xavier Debruille
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 10.  Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

2.  Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear hearing loss and the detection of sinusoidal versus random amplitude modulation.

Authors:  John H Grose; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne; Timothy J Villabona
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Short-Term Musical Training and Pyschoacoustical Abilities.

Authors:  Chandni Jain; Hijas Mohamed; Ajith U Kumar
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2014-11-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.