Literature DB >> 21877806

Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Joseph G Desloge1, Charlotte M Reed, Louis D Braida, Zachary D Perez, Lorraine A Delhorne.   

Abstract

A functional simulation of hearing loss was evaluated in its ability to reproduce the temporal masking functions for eight listeners with mild to severe sensorineural hearing loss. Each audiometric loss was simulated in a group of age-matched normal-hearing listeners through a combination of spectrally-shaped masking noise and multi-band expansion. Temporal-masking functions were obtained in both groups of listeners using a forward-masking paradigm in which the level of a 110-ms masker required to just mask a 10-ms fixed-level probe (5-10 dB SL) was measured as a function of the time delay between the masker offset and probe onset. At each of four probe frequencies (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz), temporal-masking functions were obtained using maskers that were 0.55, 1.0, and 1.15 times the probe frequency. The slopes and y-intercepts of the masking functions were not significantly different for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss. The y-intercepts were positively correlated with level of hearing loss while the slopes were negatively correlated. The ratio of the slopes obtained with the low-frequency maskers relative to the on-frequency maskers was similar for both groups of listeners and indicated a smaller compressive effect than that observed in normal-hearing listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21877806      PMCID: PMC3190659          DOI: 10.1121/1.3607599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  57 in total

1.  Temporal integration in normal hearing, cochlear impairment, and impairment simulated by masking.

Authors:  M Florentine; H Fastl; S Buus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masked and filtered simulation of hearing loss: effects on consonant recognition.

Authors:  D A Fabry; D J Van Tasell
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1986-06

4.  Simulation of the effect of recruitment on loudness relationships in speech.

Authors:  E Villchur
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Temporal integration of forward masking in listeners having sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; L L Feth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments.

Authors:  M Florentine; S Buus
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-09

7.  Temporal resolution in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  D A Nelson; R L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers.

Authors:  L E Humes; D D Dirks; T S Bell; G E Kincaid
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Masking, temporal integration, and sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  D Y Chung
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1981-12

10.  Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment.

Authors:  P M Zurek; L A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  The influence of hearing-aid compression on forward-masked thresholds for adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Ryan W McCreery; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03

3.  Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne; Timothy J Villabona
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.840

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.