Literature DB >> 25235005

Consonant identification using temporal fine structure and recovered envelope cues.

Jayaganesh Swaminathan1, Charlotte M Reed1, Joseph G Desloge1, Louis D Braida1, Lorraine A Delhorne1.   

Abstract

The contribution of recovered envelopes (RENVs) to the utilization of temporal-fine structure (TFS) speech cues was examined in normal-hearing listeners. Consonant identification experiments used speech stimuli processed to present TFS or RENV cues. Experiment 1 examined the effects of exposure and presentation order using 16-band TFS speech and 40-band RENV speech recovered from 16-band TFS speech. Prior exposure to TFS speech aided in the reception of RENV speech. Performance on the two conditions was similar (∼50%-correct) for experienced listeners as was the pattern of consonant confusions. Experiment 2 examined the effect of varying the number of RENV bands recovered from 16-band TFS speech. Mean identification scores decreased as the number of RENV bands decreased from 40 to 8 and were only slightly above chance levels for 16 and 8 bands. Experiment 3 examined the effect of varying the number of bands in the TFS speech from which 40-band RENV speech was constructed. Performance fell from 85%- to 31%-correct as the number of TFS bands increased from 1 to 32. Overall, these results suggest that the interpretation of previous studies that have used TFS speech may have been confounded with the presence of RENVs.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25235005      PMCID: PMC4167752          DOI: 10.1121/1.4865920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  33 in total

1.  Consonant recordings for speech testing.

Authors:  R V Shannon; A Jensvold; M Padilla; M E Robert; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  On the dichotomy in auditory perception between temporal envelope and fine structure cues.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Kaibao Nie; Sheng Liu; Ginger Stickney; Elsa Del Rio; Ying-Yee Kong; Hongbin Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments.

Authors:  L D Braida
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-08

6.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features.

Authors:  M D Wang; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves.

Authors:  M C Liberman; L W Dodds
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Temporal-envelope reconstruction for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Nicolas Wallaert; Dan Gnansia; Agnès Claire Leger; David Timothy Ives; André Chays; Stéphane Garnier; Yves Cazals
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25
View more
  10 in total

1.  Dual-carrier processing to convey temporal fine structure cues: Implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Carla L Youngdahl; Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of recovered envelope cues in the identification of temporal-fine-structure speech for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; Joseph G Desloge; Louis D Braida; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Predictions of Speech Chimaera Intelligibility Using Auditory Nerve Mean-Rate and Spike-Timing Neural Cues.

Authors:  Michael R Wirtzfeld; Rasha A Ibrahim; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-07-26

4.  Relative contributions of acoustic temporal fine structure and envelope cues for lexical tone perception in noise.

Authors:  Beier Qi; Yitao Mao; Jiaxing Liu; Bo Liu; Li Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Role of short-time acoustic temporal fine structure cues in sentence recognition for normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Limin Hou; Li Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; Charlotte M Reed; Joseph G Desloge; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Spectral and Temporal Envelope Cues for Human and Automatic Speech Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Guangxin Hu; Sarah C Determan; Yue Dong; Alec T Beeve; Joshua E Collins; Yan Gai
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-11-22

8.  Binaural sensitivity and release from speech-on-speech masking in listeners with and without hearing loss.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Adrian Y Cho; Mathieu Lavandier; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Uncertain Emotion Discrimination Differences Between Musicians and Non-musicians Is Determined by Fine Structure Association: Hilbert Transform Psychophysics.

Authors:  Francis A M Manno; Raul R Cruces; Condon Lau; Fernando A Barrios
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Signal envelope and speech intelligibility differentially impact auditory motion perception.

Authors:  Michaela Warnecke; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.