Literature DB >> 25234892

Auditory and tactile gap discrimination by observers with normal and impaired hearing.

Joseph G Desloge1, Charlotte M Reed1, Louis D Braida1, Zachary D Perez1, Lorraine A Delhorne1, Timothy J Villabona1.   

Abstract

Temporal processing ability for the senses of hearing and touch was examined through the measurement of gap-duration discrimination thresholds (GDDTs) employing the same low-frequency sinusoidal stimuli in both modalities. GDDTs were measured in three groups of observers (normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and normal-hearing with simulated hearing loss) covering an age range of 21-69 yr. GDDTs for a baseline gap of 6 ms were measured for four different combinations of 100-ms leading and trailing markers (250-250, 250-400, 400-250, and 400-400 Hz). Auditory measurements were obtained for monaural presentation over headphones and tactile measurements were obtained using sinusoidal vibrations presented to the left middle finger. The auditory GDDTs of the hearing-impaired listeners, which were larger than those of the normal-hearing observers, were well-reproduced in the listeners with simulated loss. The magnitude of the GDDT was generally independent of modality and showed effects of age in both modalities. The use of different-frequency compared to same-frequency markers led to a greater deterioration in auditory GDDTs compared to tactile GDDTs and may reflect differences in bandwidth properties between the two sensory systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234892      PMCID: PMC3985970          DOI: 10.1121/1.4861246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  48 in total

1.  Influence of spatial and temporal coding on auditory gap detection.

Authors:  A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Somatosensory input to auditory association cortex in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  C E Schroeder; R W Lindsley; C Specht; A Marcovici; J F Smiley; D C Javitt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Temporal gap detection in tactile channels.

Authors:  George A Gescheider; Stanley J Bolanowski; Sarah K Chatterton
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.111

4.  Correlations among within-channel and between-channel auditory gap-detection thresholds in normal listeners.

Authors:  Dennis P Phillips; Jennifer C Smith
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

5.  Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by progressions of frequency sensitivity.

Authors:  Thomas M Talavage; Martin I Sereno; Jennifer R Melcher; Patrick J Ledden; Bruce R Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Simulation of the effect of recruitment on loudness relationships in speech.

Authors:  E Villchur
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  High-frequency audiometric assessment of a young adult population.

Authors:  D M Green; G Kidd; K N Stevens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Change in vibrotactile thresholds as a function of age.

Authors:  R T Verrillo
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1979-03

9.  Resolving of successive clicks by the ears and skin.

Authors:  G A Gescheider
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-03

10.  Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments.

Authors:  M Florentine; S Buus
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.