Literature DB >> 22581109

Characterization of a high-resolution hybrid DOI detector for a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner.

Felipe Godinez1, Abhijit J Chaudhari, Yongfeng Yang, Richard Farrell, Ramsey D Badawi.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to design and test a new high-resolution hybrid depth of interaction (DOI) detector for a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner. Two detectors have been designed and built. The completed detectors are based on a 14 × 14 array of 1.5 × 1.5 × 20 mm(3) unpolished lutetium orthosilicate scintillation crystals, with each element coated in a 50 μm layer of reflective material. The detector is read out from both ends using a position-sensitive photomultiplier tube (PSPMT) and a large active area (20 × 20 mm(2)) avalanche photodiode (APD) to enable acquisition of DOI information. Nuclear instrumentation modules were used to characterize the detectors' performances in terms of timing, intrinsic spatial resolution (ISR) and energy resolution, as well as DOI resolution with a dual-ended readout configuration. Measurements with the APD were performed at a temperature of 10 °C. All crystals were identified at all depths, even though the signal amplitude from the PSPMT decreases with depth away from it. We measured a timing resolution of 2.4 ns, and an average energy resolution of 19%. The mean ISR was measured to be 1.2 mm for crystals in the central row of the array for detectors in the face-to-face position. Two off-center positions were measured corresponding to 26° and 51° oblique photon incidence, and the mean ISR at these positions was 1.5 and 1.7 mm, respectively. The average DOI resolution across all crystals and depths was measured to be 2.9 mm (including the beam width of 0.6 mm). This detector design shows good promise as a high-resolution detector for a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22581109      PMCID: PMC3397825          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/11/3435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of high performance data acquisition boards for simultaneous sampling of fast signals from PET detectors.

Authors:  Martin S Judenhofer; Bernd J Pichler; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Depth of interaction resolution measurements for a high resolution PET detector using position sensitive avalanche photodiodes.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Purushottam A Dokhale; Robert W Silverman; Kanai S Shah; Mickel A McClish; Richard Farrell; Gerald Entine; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A retrospective on the LBNL PEM project.

Authors:  Jennifer S Huber; William W Moses; Gin-Chung Wang; Stephen E Derenzo; Ronald H Huesman; Jinyi Qi; Patrick Virador; Woon-Seng Choong; Emanuele Mandelli; Eric Beuville; Marzio Pedrali-Noy; Brad Krieger; Gerrit J Meddeler
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Virtual-pinhole PET.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Heyu Wu; Debashish Pal; Joseph A O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Evaluation of the quantitative accuracy of a commercially available positron emission mammography scanner.

Authors:  Adam Springer; Osama R Mawlawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Hannah M Linden; Svetlana A Stekhova; Jeanne M Link; Julie R Gralow; Robert B Livingston; Georgiana K Ellis; Philip H Petra; Lanell M Peterson; Erin K Schubert; Lisa K Dunnwald; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Feasibility study for positron emission mammography.

Authors:  C J Thompson; K Murthy; I N Weinberg; F Mako
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Evolving role of positron emission tomography in breast cancer imaging.

Authors:  William B Eubank; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.446

9.  Initial clinical test of a breast-PET scanner.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylman; Jame Abraham; Hannah Hazard; Courtney Koren; Shannon Filburn; Judith S Schreiman; Sobha Kurian; Stan Majewski; Gary D Marano
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.735

10.  Primary and metastatic breast carcinoma: initial clinical evaluation with PET with the radiolabeled glucose analogue 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

Authors:  R L Wahl; R L Cody; G D Hutchins; E E Mudgett
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of reflector and crystal surface on the performance of a depth-encoding PET detector with dual-ended readout.

Authors:  Silin Ren; Yongfeng Yang; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Efficient system modeling for a small animal PET scanner with tapered DOI detectors.

Authors:  Mengxi Zhang; Jian Zhou; Yongfeng Yang; Mercedes Rodríguez-Villafuerte; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Development of a prototype PET scanner with depth-of-interaction measurement using solid-state photomultiplier arrays and parallel readout electronics.

Authors:  Yiping Shao; Xishan Sun; Kejian A Lan; Chad Bircher; Kai Lou; Zhi Deng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Radionuclide methods and instrumentation for breast cancer detection and diagnosis.

Authors:  Suleman Surti
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.446

5.  Development and initial characterization of a high-resolution PET detector module with DOI.

Authors:  Mohan Li; Yuli Wang; Shiva Abbaszadeh
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2020-10-14

6.  Analytical study of the effect of the system geometry on photon sensitivity and depth of interaction of positron emission mammography.

Authors:  Pablo Aguiar; Cristina Lois
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 4.375

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.