Literature DB >> 23725989

Radionuclide methods and instrumentation for breast cancer detection and diagnosis.

Suleman Surti1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer mammography is a well-acknowledged technique for patient screening due to its high sensitivity. However, in addition to its low specificity the sensitivity of mammography is limited when imaging patients with dense breasts. Radionuclide imaging techniques, such as coincidence photon-based positron emission tomography and single photon emission computed tomography or scintimammography, can play a role in assisting screening of such patients. Radionuclide techniques can also be useful in assessing treatment response of patients with breast cancer to therapy, and staging of patients to diagnose the disease extent. However, the performance of these imaging modalities is generally limited because of the poor spatial resolution and sensitivity of the commercially available multipurpose imaging systems. Here, we describe some of the dedicated imaging systems (positron emission mammography [PEM] and breast-specific gamma imaging [BSGI]) that have been developed both commercially and in research laboratories for radionuclide imaging of breast cancer. Clinical studies with dedicated PEM scanners show improved sensitivity to detecting cancer in patients when using PEM in conjunction with additional imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging or mammography or both, as well as improved disease staging that can have an effect on surgical planning. High-resolution BSGI systems are more widely available commercially and several clinical studies have shown very high sensitivity and specificity in detecting cancer in high-risk patients. Further development of dedicated PEM and BSGI systems is ongoing, promising further expansion of radionuclide imaging techniques in the realm of breast cancer detection and treatment.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23725989      PMCID: PMC3755372          DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2013.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  44 in total

1.  Dual-modality breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Mark B Williams; Patricia G Judy; Spencer Gunn; Stanislaw Majewski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Virtual-pinhole PET.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Heyu Wu; Debashish Pal; Joseph A O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Deborah J Rhodes; Carrie B Hruska; Stephen W Phillips; Dana H Whaley; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Molecular breast imaging: advantages and limitations of a scintimammographic technique in patients with small breast tumors.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor; Stephen W Phillips; Carrie B Hruska; Deborah J Rhodes; Douglas A Collins
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

6.  Observer detection limits for a dedicated SPECT breast imaging system.

Authors:  S J Cutler; K L Perez; H X Barnhart; M P Tornai
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.

Authors:  Suleman Surti; Austin Kuhn; Matthew E Werner; Amy E Perkins; Jeffrey Kolthammer; Joel S Karp
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Initial characterization of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner during human imaging.

Authors:  Spencer L Bowen; Yibao Wu; Abhijit J Chaudhari; Lin Fu; Nathan J Packard; George W Burkett; Kai Yang; Karen K Lindfors; David K Shelton; Rosalie Hagge; Alexander D Borowsky; Steve R Martinez; Jinyi Qi; John M Boone; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  PET characteristics of a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner prototype.

Authors:  Yibao Wu; Spencer L Bowen; Kai Yang; Nathan Packard; Lin Fu; George Burkett; Jinyi Qi; John M Boone; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Molecular breast imaging: use of a dual-head dedicated gamma camera to detect small breast tumors.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Stephen W Phillips; Dana H Whaley; Deborah J Rhodes; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  5 in total

1.  PET/MRI for Primary Breast Cancer: A Match Made Better by PET Quantification?

Authors:  David A Mankoff; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2021-01-15

2.  Augmented Whole-Body Scanning via Magnifying PET.

Authors:  Jianyong Jiang; Suranjana Samanta; Ke Li; Stefan B Siegel; Robert A Mintzer; Sanghee Cho; Maurizio Conti; Matthias Schmand; Joseph O'Sullivan; Yuan-Chuan Tai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Evaluating attenuation correction strategies in a dedicated, single-gantry breast PET-tomosynthesis scanner.

Authors:  Srilalan Krishnamoorthy; Trevor Vent; Bruno Barufaldi; Andrew D A Maidment; Joel S Karp; Suleman Surti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Current State of Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Theranostics.

Authors:  Arya Bhushan; Andrea Gonsalves; Jyothi U Menon
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.321

Review 5.  The role of general nuclear medicine in breast cancer.

Authors:  Lacey R Greene; Deborah Wilkinson
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2015-02-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.