UNLABELLED: We proposed and tested a novel geometry for PET system design analogous to pinhole SPECT called the virtual-pinhole PET (VP-PET) geometry to determine whether it could provide high-resolution images. METHODS: We analyzed the effects of photon acolinearity and detector sizes on system resolution and extended the empiric formula for reconstructed image resolution of conventional PET proposed earlier to predict the resolutions of VP-PET. To measure the system resolution of VP-PET, we recorded coincidence events as a (22)Na point source was stepped across the coincidence line of response between 2 detectors made from identical arrays of 12 x 12 lutetium oxyorthosilicate crystals (each measuring 1.51 x 1.51 x 10 mm(3)) separated by 565 mm. To measure reconstructed image resolution, we built 4 VP-PET systems using 4 types of detectors (width, 1.51-6.4 mm) and imaged 4 point sources of (64)Cu (half-life = 12.7 h to allow a long acquisition time). Tangential and radial resolutions were measured and averaged for each source and each system. We then imaged a polystyrene plastic phantom representing a 2.5-cm-thick cross-section of isolated breast volume. The phantom was filled with an aqueous solution of (64)Cu (713 kBq/mL) in which the following were imbedded: 4 spheric tumors ranging from 1.8 to 12.6 mm in inner diameter (ID), 6 micropipettes (0.7- or 1.1-mm ID filled with (64)Cu at 5x, 20x, or 50x background), and a 10.0-mm outer-diameter cold lesion. RESULTS: The shape and measured full width at half maximum of the line spread functions agree well with the predicted values. Measured reconstructed image resolution (2.40-3.24 mm) was +/-6% of the predicted value for 3 of the 4 systems. In one case, the difference was 12.6%, possibly due to underestimation of the block effect from the low-resolution detector. In phantom experiments, all spheric tumors were detected. Small line sources were detected if the activity concentration is at least 20x background. CONCLUSION: We have developed and characterized a novel geometry for PET. A PET system following the VP-PET geometry provides high-resolution images for objects near the system's high-resolution detectors. This geometry may lead to the development of special-purpose PET systems or resolution-enhancing insert devices for conventional PET scanners.
UNLABELLED: We proposed and tested a novel geometry for PET system design analogous to pinhole SPECT called the virtual-pinhole PET (VP-PET) geometry to determine whether it could provide high-resolution images. METHODS: We analyzed the effects of photon acolinearity and detector sizes on system resolution and extended the empiric formula for reconstructed image resolution of conventional PET proposed earlier to predict the resolutions of VP-PET. To measure the system resolution of VP-PET, we recorded coincidence events as a (22)Na point source was stepped across the coincidence line of response between 2 detectors made from identical arrays of 12 x 12 lutetium oxyorthosilicate crystals (each measuring 1.51 x 1.51 x 10 mm(3)) separated by 565 mm. To measure reconstructed image resolution, we built 4 VP-PET systems using 4 types of detectors (width, 1.51-6.4 mm) and imaged 4 point sources of (64)Cu (half-life = 12.7 h to allow a long acquisition time). Tangential and radial resolutions were measured and averaged for each source and each system. We then imaged a polystyrene plastic phantom representing a 2.5-cm-thick cross-section of isolated breast volume. The phantom was filled with an aqueous solution of (64)Cu (713 kBq/mL) in which the following were imbedded: 4 spheric tumors ranging from 1.8 to 12.6 mm in inner diameter (ID), 6 micropipettes (0.7- or 1.1-mm ID filled with (64)Cu at 5x, 20x, or 50x background), and a 10.0-mm outer-diameter cold lesion. RESULTS: The shape and measured full width at half maximum of the line spread functions agree well with the predicted values. Measured reconstructed image resolution (2.40-3.24 mm) was +/-6% of the predicted value for 3 of the 4 systems. In one case, the difference was 12.6%, possibly due to underestimation of the block effect from the low-resolution detector. In phantom experiments, all spheric tumors were detected. Small line sources were detected if the activity concentration is at least 20x background. CONCLUSION: We have developed and characterized a novel geometry for PET. A PET system following the VP-PET geometry provides high-resolution images for objects near the system's high-resolution detectors. This geometry may lead to the development of special-purpose PET systems or resolution-enhancing insert devices for conventional PET scanners.
Authors: C Tai; A Chatziioannou; S Siegel; J Young; D Newport; R N Goble; R E Nutt; S R Cherry Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: T Beyer; D W Townsend; T Brun; P E Kinahan; M Charron; R Roddy; J Jerin; J Young; L Byars; R Nutt Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: M E Phelps; E J Hoffman; R E Coleman; M J Welch; M E Raichle; E S Weiss; B E Sobel; M M Ter-Pogossian Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 1976-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: G Di Chiro; R L DeLaPaz; R A Brooks; L Sokoloff; P L Kornblith; B H Smith; N J Patronas; C V Kufta; R M Kessler; G S Johnston; R G Manning; A P Wolf Journal: Neurology Date: 1982-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Aswin John Mathews; Ke Li; Sergey Komarov; Qiang Wang; Bosky Ravindranath; Joseph A O'Sullivan; Yuan-Chuan Tai Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: A Studen; D Burdette; E Chesi; V Cindro; N H Clinthorne; E Cochran; B Grosicar; H Kagan; C Lacasta; V Linhart; M Mikuz; V Stankova; P Weilhammer; D Zontar Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 0.972
Authors: Neal Clinthorne; Eric Cochran; Enrico Chesi; Milan Grkovski; Borut Grošičar; Klaus Honscheid; Sam S Huh; Harris Kagan; Carlos Lacasta; Karol Brzezinski; Vladimir Linhart; Marko Mikuž; D Shane Smith; Vera Stankova; Andrej Studen; Peter Weilhammer; Dejan Žontar Journal: Phys Procedia Date: 2012-10-02
Authors: Spencer L Bowen; Yibao Wu; Abhijit J Chaudhari; Lin Fu; Nathan J Packard; George W Burkett; Kai Yang; Karen K Lindfors; David K Shelton; Rosalie Hagge; Alexander D Borowsky; Steve R Martinez; Jinyi Qi; John M Boone; Simon R Cherry; Ramsey D Badawi Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 10.057