Literature DB >> 16682724

Quantitative fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography imaging predicts response to endocrine treatment in breast cancer.

Hannah M Linden1, Svetlana A Stekhova, Jeanne M Link, Julie R Gralow, Robert B Livingston, Georgiana K Ellis, Philip H Petra, Lanell M Peterson, Erin K Schubert, Lisa K Dunnwald, Kenneth A Krohn, David A Mankoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In breast cancer, [(18)F]fluoroestradiol (FES) positron emission tomography (PET) correlates with estrogen receptors (ER) expression and predicts response to tamoxifen. We tested the ability of FES-PET imaging to predict response to salvage hormonal treatment in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients, predominantly treated with aromatase inhibitors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Initial FES uptake measurements in 47 patients with ER-positive tumors were correlated with subsequent tumor response to 6 months of hormonal treatment. Most patients had bone dominant disease and prior tamoxifen exposure. Response was compared to initial FES-PET uptake, measured qualitatively and quantitatively using standardized uptake value (SUV) and estradiol-binding flux.
RESULTS: Eleven of 47 patients (23%) had an objective response. While no patients with absent FES uptake had a response to treatment, the association between qualitative FES-PET results and response was not significant (P = .14). However, quantitative FES uptake and response were significantly associated; zero of 15 patients with initial SUV less than 1.5 responded to hormonal therapy, compared with 11 of 32 patients (34%) with SUV higher than 1.5 (P < .01). In the subset of patients whose tumors did not overexpress HER2/neu, 11 of 24 patients (46%) with SUV higher than 1.5 responded.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative FES-PET can predict response to hormonal therapy and may help guide treatment selection. Treatment selection using quantitative FES-PET in our patient series would have increased the rate of response from 23% to 34% overall, and from 29% to 46% in the subset of patients lacking HER2/neu overexpression. A multi-institutional collaborative trial would permit definitive assessment of the value of FES-PET for therapeutic decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16682724     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.3810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  113 in total

1.  Small-animal PET of steroid hormone receptors predicts tumor response to endocrine therapy using a preclinical model of breast cancer.

Authors:  Amy M Fowler; Szeman Ruby Chan; Terry L Sharp; Nicole M Fettig; Dong Zhou; Carmen S Dence; Kathryn E Carlson; M Jeyakumar; John A Katzenellenbogen; Robert D Schreiber; Michael J Welch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Can FDG PET/CT monitor the response to hormonal therapy in breast cancer patients?

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Domenico Rubello; Giorgio Saladini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Assessment of response to endocrine therapy using FDG PET/CT in metastatic breast cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Nina Mortazavi-Jehanno; Anne-Laure Giraudet; Laurence Champion; Florence Lerebours; Elise Le Stanc; Veronique Edeline; Olivier Madar; Dominique Bellet; Alain Paul Pecking; Jean-Louis Alberini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Molecular imaging-its current role in cancer.

Authors:  S McDermott; A Kilcoyne
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2015-08-07

5.  Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging correlates with final pathological response in breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Albert E Cerussi; Vaya W Tanamai; David Hsiang; John Butler; Rita S Mehta; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Current and future use of positron emission tomography (PET) in breast cancer.

Authors:  David A Mankoff; William B Eubank
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 7.  Targeted functional imaging in breast cancer.

Authors:  Rakesh Kumar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography reveals differences in pharmacodynamics of aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, and fulvestrant in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Hannah M Linden; Brenda F Kurland; Lanell M Peterson; Erin K Schubert; Julie R Gralow; Jennifer M Specht; Georgiana K Ellis; Thomas J Lawton; Robert B Livingston; Philip H Petra; Jeanne M Link; Kenneth A Krohn; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  64Cu-Labeled Gp2 Domain for PET Imaging of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.

Authors:  Max A Kruziki; Brett A Case; Jie Y Chan; Elizabeth J Zudock; Daniel R Woldring; Douglas Yee; Benjamin J Hackel
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 10.  Molecular imaging to guide systemic cancer therapy: Illustrative examples of PET imaging cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Austin R Pantel; David A Mankoff
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 8.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.