Literature DB >> 8058019

Feasibility study for positron emission mammography.

C J Thompson1, K Murthy, I N Weinberg, F Mako.   

Abstract

A feasibility study is presented for a small, low-cost, dedicated device for positron emission mammography. Two detector arrays above and below the breast would be placed in a conventional mammography unit. These detectors are sensitive to positron annihilation radiation, and are connected to a coincidence circuit and a multiplane image memory. Images of the distribution of positron-emitting isotope are obtained in real time by incrementing the memory location at the intersection of each line of response. Monte Carlo simulations of a breast phantom are compared with actual scans of this phantom in a conventional PET scanner. The simulations and experimental data are used to predict the performance of the proposed system. Spatial resolution experiments using very narrow bismuth germanate BGO crystals suggest that spatial resolutions of about 2 mm should be possible. The efficiency of the proposed device is about ten times that of a conventional brain scanner. The scatter fraction is greater, but the scattered radiation has a very flat distribution. By designing the device to fit in an existing mammography unit, conventional mammograms can be taken after the injection of the radio-pharmaceutical allowing exact registration of the emission and conventional mammographic images.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8058019     DOI: 10.1118/1.597169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  30 in total

1.  Investigating the limit of detectability of a positron emission mammography device: a phantom study.

Authors:  Nicholas A Shkumat; Adam Springer; Christopher M Walker; Eric M Rohren; Wei T Yang; Beatriz E Adrada; Elsa Arribas; Selin Carkaci; Hubert H Chuang; Lumarie Santiago; Osama R Mawlawi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Clinical Imaging Characteristics of the Positron Emission Mammography PEM Flex Solo II.

Authors:  Lawrence Macdonald; John Edwards; Thomas Lewellen; James Rogers; Paul Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2008-10

3.  Improving PET imaging for breast cancer using virtual pinhole PET half-ring insert.

Authors:  Aswin John Mathews; Sergey Komarov; Heyu Wu; Joseph A O'Sullivan; Yuan-Chuan Tai
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Novel detector technology for clinical PET.

Authors:  Roger Lecomte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET scanner.

Authors:  S Surti; J S Karp
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Preliminary results for positron emission mammography: real-time functional breast imaging in a conventional mammography gantry.

Authors:  I Weinberg; S Majewski; A Weisenberger; A Markowitz; L Aloj; L Majewski; D Danforth; J Mulshine; K Cowan; J Zujewski; C Chow; E Jones; V Chang; W Berg; J Frank
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-07

Review 7.  Nuclear imaging of the breast: translating achievements in instrumentation into clinical use.

Authors:  Carrie B Hruska; Michael K O'Connor
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Quantification of radiotracer uptake with a dedicated breast PET imaging system.

Authors:  Raymond R Raylmana; Mark F Smith; Paul E Kinahan; Stan Majewski
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 10.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Isabel Igerc; Thomas Beyer; Peter Reinprecht; Klaus Hausegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.