PURPOSE: Accurate measurements of the RF power delivered during clinical MRI are essential for safety and regulatory compliance, avoiding inappropriate restrictions on clinical MRI sequences, and for testing the MRI safety of peripheral and interventional devices at known RF exposure levels. The goal is to make independent RF power measurements to test the accuracy of scanner-reported specific absorption rate (SAR) over the extraordinary range of operating conditions routinely encountered in MRI. METHODS: A six channel, high dynamic range, real-time power profiling system was designed and built for monitoring power delivery during MRI up to 440 MHz. The system was calibrated and used in two 3 T scanners to measure power applied to human subjects during MRI scans. The results were compared with the scanner-reported SAR. RESULTS: The new power measurement system has highly linear performance over a 90 dB dynamic range and a wide range of MRI duty cycles. It has about 0.1 dB insertion loss that does not interfere with scanner operation. The measurements of whole-body SAR in volunteers showed that scanner-reported SAR was significantly overestimated by up to about 2.2 fold. CONCLUSIONS: The new power monitor system can accurately and independently measure RF power deposition over the wide range of conditions routinely encountered during MRI. Scanner-reported SAR values are not appropriate for setting exposure limits during device or pulse sequence testing.
PURPOSE: Accurate measurements of the RF power delivered during clinical MRI are essential for safety and regulatory compliance, avoiding inappropriate restrictions on clinical MRI sequences, and for testing the MRI safety of peripheral and interventional devices at known RF exposure levels. The goal is to make independent RF power measurements to test the accuracy of scanner-reported specific absorption rate (SAR) over the extraordinary range of operating conditions routinely encountered in MRI. METHODS: A six channel, high dynamic range, real-time power profiling system was designed and built for monitoring power delivery during MRI up to 440 MHz. The system was calibrated and used in two 3 T scanners to measure power applied to human subjects during MRI scans. The results were compared with the scanner-reported SAR. RESULTS: The new power measurement system has highly linear performance over a 90 dB dynamic range and a wide range of MRI duty cycles. It has about 0.1 dB insertion loss that does not interfere with scanner operation. The measurements of whole-body SAR in volunteers showed that scanner-reported SAR was significantly overestimated by up to about 2.2 fold. CONCLUSIONS: The new power monitor system can accurately and independently measure RF power deposition over the wide range of conditions routinely encountered during MRI. Scanner-reported SAR values are not appropriate for setting exposure limits during device or pulse sequence testing.
Authors: Zhangwei Wang; James C Lin; Weihua Mao; Wanzhan Liu; Michael B Smith; Christopher M Collins Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Kenneth B Baker; Jean A Tkach; John A Nyenhuis; Michael Phillips; Frank G Shellock; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; Ali R Rezai Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Di Qian; AbdEl-Monem M El-Sharkawy; Paul A Bottomley; William A Edelstein Journal: Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med Sci Meet Exhib Int Soc Magn Reson Med Sci Meet Exhib Date: 2013
Authors: N Gudino; M Sonmez; Z Yao; T Baig; S Nielles-Vallespin; A Z Faranesh; R J Lederman; M Martens; R S Balaban; M S Hansen; M A Griswold Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Gerd Weidemann; Frank Seifert; Werner Hoffmann; Harald Pfeiffer; Reiner Seemann; Bernd Ittermann Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Sean Owens; M Arcan Erturk; Jean-Pierre P Ouanes; Jamie D Murphy; Christopher L Wu; Paul A Bottomley Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Natalia Gudino; Jacco A de Zwart; Qi Duan; Stephen J Dodd; Joe Murphy-Boesch; Peter van Gelderen; Jeff H Duyn Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 4.668