Literature DB >> 24705365

Minimum acquisition methods for simultaneously imaging T(1), T(2), and proton density with B(1) correction and no spin-echoes.

Guan Wang1, AbdEl-Monem M El-Sharkawy2, Paul A Bottomley3.   

Abstract

The spin lattice (T(1)) and spin-spin (T(2)) relaxation times, along with the proton density (PD) contain almost all of the information that (1)H MRI routinely uses in clinical diagnosis and research, but are seldom imaged directly. Here, three methods for directly imaging T(1), T(2), and PD with the least possible number of acquisitions - three, are presented. All methods utilize long 0° self-refocusing adiabatic pre-pulses instead of spin-echoes to encode the T(2) information prior to a conventional gradient-echo MRI sequence. T(1) information is encoded by varying the flip-angle (FA) in the 'Dual-τ Dual-FA' and 'Four-FA' methods, or the sequence repetition period, TR, in the 'Dual-τ Dual-TR' method. Inhomogeneity in the FA distribution and slice-selection profile are recognized as the main error sources for T(1) measurements. The former is remedied by integrating an extra FA-dependent acquisition into the 'Four-FA' method to provide self-corrected T(1), T(2), PD, and FA in just four acquisitions - again, the minimum possible. Slice profile errors - which manifest as differences between 2D and 3D T(1) measurements, can be addressed by Bloch equation analysis and experimental calibration. All three methods are validated in phantom studies, and the 'Dual-τ Dual-FA' and 'Four-FA' methods are validated in human brain studies using standard partial saturation and spin-echo methods for reference. The new methods offer a minimum-acquisition option for imaging single-component T(1), T(2), and PD. 'Four-FA' performs best overall in accuracy, with high efficiency per unit accuracy vs. existing methods when B(1)-inhomogeneity is appropriately addressed.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B(1) correction; MRI; Measurement; Proton density; Spin–latice relaxation; Spin–spin relaxation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24705365      PMCID: PMC4058094          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  29 in total

1.  Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state.

Authors:  Sean C L Deoni; Brian K Rutt; Terry M Peters
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Inversion recovery TrueFISP: quantification of T(1), T(2), and spin density.

Authors:  Peter Schmitt; Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Markus Kotas; Vikas Gulani; Michael Flentje; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Triple echo steady-state (TESS) relaxometry.

Authors:  Rahel Heule; Carl Ganter; Oliver Bieri
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging.

Authors:  E K Fram; R J Herfkens; G A Johnson; G H Glover; J P Karis; A Shimakawa; T G Perkins; N J Pelc
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Adiabatic refocusing pulse which compensates for variable rf power and off-resonance effects.

Authors:  M R Bendall; M Garwood; K Uğurbil; D T Pegg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  A comparison of one-shot and recovery methods in T1 imaging.

Authors:  A P Crawley; R M Henkelman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Potential problems with selective pulses in NMR imaging systems.

Authors:  P M Joseph; L Axel; M O'Donnell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1984 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  A computer algorithm for the simulation of any nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging method.

Authors:  J Bittoun; J Taquin; M Sauzade
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.546

9.  Signal, noise, and contrast in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging.

Authors:  W A Edelstein; P A Bottomley; H R Hart; L S Smith
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Comparison of longitudinal metabolite relaxation times in different regions of the human brain at 1.5 and 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Thomas Ethofer; Irina Mader; Uwe Seeger; Gunther Helms; Michael Erb; Wolfgang Grodd; Albert Ludolph; Uwe Klose
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ultrafast compartmentalized relaxation time mapping with linear algebraic modeling.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Xiaoyang Liu; Jinyuan Zhou; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Ultrafast compartmental relaxation time mapping with linear algebraic modeling.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Xiaoyang Liu; Jinyuan Zhou; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med Sci Meet Exhib Int Soc Magn Reson Med Sci Meet Exhib       Date:  2017-04

3.  Potential clinical impact of multiparametric quantitative MR spectroscopy in neurological disorders: A review and analysis.

Authors:  Ivan I Kirov; Assaf Tal
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Automated classification of vessel disease based on high-resolution intravascular multi-parametric mapping MRI.

Authors:  Guan Wang; M Arcan Erturk; Shashank Sathyanarayana Hegde; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med Sci Meet Exhib Int Soc Magn Reson Med Sci Meet Exhib       Date:  2015 May-Jun

Review 5.  Oxidative stress measured in vivo without an exogenous contrast agent using QUEST MRI.

Authors:  Bruce A Berkowitz
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  High-resolution and accelerated multi-parametric mapping with automated characterization of vessel disease using intravascular MRI.

Authors:  Guan Wang; Yi Zhang; Shashank Sathyanarayana Hegde; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 5.364

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.