Literature DB >> 22493226

Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure.

Ramón A Alvarez1, Stephen W Pacala, James J Winebrake, William L Chameides, Steven P Hamburg.   

Abstract

Natural gas is seen by many as the future of American energy: a fuel that can provide energy independence and reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the process. However, there has also been confusion about the climate implications of increased use of natural gas for electric power and transportation. We propose and illustrate the use of technology warming potentials as a robust and transparent way to compare the cumulative radiative forcing created by alternative technologies fueled by natural gas and oil or coal by using the best available estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from each fuel cycle (i.e., production, transportation and use). We find that a shift to compressed natural gas vehicles from gasoline or diesel vehicles leads to greater radiative forcing of the climate for 80 or 280 yr, respectively, before beginning to produce benefits. Compressed natural gas vehicles could produce climate benefits on all time frames if the well-to-wheels CH(4) leakage were capped at a level 45-70% below current estimates. By contrast, using natural gas instead of coal for electric power plants can reduce radiative forcing immediately, and reducing CH(4) losses from the production and transportation of natural gas would produce even greater benefits. There is a need for the natural gas industry and science community to help obtain better emissions data and for increased efforts to reduce methane leakage in order to minimize the climate footprint of natural gas.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22493226      PMCID: PMC3340093          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1202407109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum.

Authors:  Andrew Burnham; Jeongwoo Han; Corrie E Clark; Michael Wang; Jennifer B Dunn; Ignasi Palou-Rivera
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Improvements in the operation of SO2 scrubbers in China's coal power plants.

Authors:  Yuan Xu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation.

Authors:  Paulina Jaramillo; W Michael Griffin; H Scott Matthews
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Climate forcing from the transport sectors.

Authors:  Jan Fuglestvedt; Terje Berntsen; Gunnar Myhre; Kristin Rypdal; Ragnhild Bieltvedt Skeie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Estimate of methane emissions from the U.S. natural gas industry.

Authors:  D A Kirchgessner; R A Lott; R M Cowgill; M R Harrison; T M Shires
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from United States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy.

Authors:  Aranya Venkatesh; Paulina Jaramillo; W Michael Griffin; H Scott Matthews
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total
  34 in total

1.  Temperature change vs. cumulative radiative forcing as metrics for evaluating climate consequences of energy system choices.

Authors:  Ken Caldeira; Nathan P Myhrvold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions.

Authors:  Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; Ramón A Alvarez; Kenneth J Davis; Robert Harriss; Scott C Herndon; Anna Karion; Eric Adam Kort; Brian K Lamb; Xin Lan; Anthony J Marchese; Stephen W Pacala; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Robert Talbot; Amy Townsend-Small; Tara I Yacovitch; Daniel J Zimmerle; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States.

Authors:  David T Allen; Vincent M Torres; James Thomas; David W Sullivan; Matthew Harrison; Al Hendler; Scott C Herndon; Charles E Kolb; Matthew P Fraser; A Daniel Hill; Brian K Lamb; Jennifer Miskimins; Robert F Sawyer; John H Seinfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Electric sector policy, technological change, and U.S. emissions reductions goals: Results from the EMF 32 model intercomparison project.

Authors:  John E Bistline; Elke Hodson; Charles G Rossmann; Jared Creason; Brian Murray; Alexander R Barron
Journal:  Energy Econ       Date:  2018

5.  Role of natural gas in meeting an electric sector emissions reduction strategy and effects on greenhouse gas emissions.

Authors:  Carol Lenox; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Energy Econ       Date:  2016

6.  Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database.

Authors:  Stefan Schwietzke; Owen A Sherwood; Lori M P Bruhwiler; John B Miller; Giuseppe Etiope; Edward J Dlugokencky; Sylvia Englund Michel; Victoria A Arling; Bruce H Vaughn; James W C White; Pieter P Tans
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Shale gas development impacts on surface water quality in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Sheila M Olmstead; Lucija A Muehlenbachs; Jhih-Shyang Shih; Ziyan Chu; Alan J Krupnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Methane leaks erode green credentials of natural gas.

Authors:  Jeff Tollefson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.

Authors:  Garvin A Heath; Patrick O'Donoughue; Douglas J Arent; Morgan Bazilian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A framework to predict the impacts of shale gas infrastructures on the forest fragmentation of an agroforest region.

Authors:  Alexandre Racicot; Véronique Babin-Roussel; Jean-François Dauphinais; Jean-Sébastien Joly; Pascal Noël; Claude Lavoie
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.