Literature DB >> 24554146

A framework to predict the impacts of shale gas infrastructures on the forest fragmentation of an agroforest region.

Alexandre Racicot1, Véronique Babin-Roussel, Jean-François Dauphinais, Jean-Sébastien Joly, Pascal Noël, Claude Lavoie.   

Abstract

We propose a framework to facilitate the evaluation of the impacts of shale gas infrastructures (well pads, roads, and pipelines) on land cover features, especially with regards to forest fragmentation. We used a geographic information system and realistic development scenarios largely inspired by the PA (United States) experience, but adapted to a region of QC (Canada) with an already fragmented forest cover and a high gas potential. The scenario with the greatest impact results from development limited by regulatory constraints only, with no access to private roads for connecting well pads to the public road network. The scenario with the lowest impact additionally integrates ecological constraints (deer yards, maple woodlots, and wetlands). Overall the differences between these two scenarios are relatively minor, with <1 % of the forest cover lost in each case. However, large areas of core forests would be lost in both scenarios and the number of forest patches would increase by 13-21 % due to fragmentation. The pipeline network would have a much greater footprint on the land cover than access roads. Using data acquired since the beginning of the shale gas industry, we show that it is possible, within a reasonable time frame, to produce a robust assessment of the impacts of shale gas extraction. The framework we propose could easily be applied to other contexts or jurisdictions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24554146     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-014-0250-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  9 in total

1.  Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Stephen W Pacala; James J Winebrake; William L Chameides; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Early trends in landcover change and forest fragmentation due to shale-gas development in Pennsylvania: a potential outcome for the Northcentral Appalachians.

Authors:  P J Drohan; M Brittingham; J Bishop; K Yoder
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Risks to biodiversity from hydraulic fracturing for natural gas in the Marcellus and Utica shales.

Authors:  Erik Kiviat
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Edge-effect interactions in fragmented and patchy landscapes.

Authors:  Lauren M Porensky; Truman P Young
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 6.560

5.  Shale gas development impacts on surface water quality in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Sheila M Olmstead; Lucija A Muehlenbachs; Jhih-Shyang Shih; Ziyan Chu; Alan J Krupnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Paving the way for invasive species: road type and the spread of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia).

Authors:  Martin Joly; Pascale Bertrand; Roland Y Gbangou; Marie-Catherine White; Jean Dubé; Claude Lavoie
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.266

7.  Increased stray gas abundance in a subset of drinking water wells near Marcellus shale gas extraction.

Authors:  Robert B Jackson; Avner Vengosh; Thomas H Darrah; Nathaniel R Warner; Adrian Down; Robert J Poreda; Stephen G Osborn; Kaiguang Zhao; Jonathan D Karr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Stephen G Osborn; Avner Vengosh; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality.

Authors:  R D Vidic; S L Brantley; J M Vandenbossche; D Yoxtheimer; J D Abad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Synergies and Tradeoffs Among Environmental Impacts Under Conservation Planning of Shale Gas Surface Infrastructure.

Authors:  Austin W Milt; Tamara Gagnolet; Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.