Literature DB >> 25049378

Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.

Garvin A Heath1, Patrick O'Donoughue2, Douglas J Arent2, Morgan Bazilian2.   

Abstract

Recent technological advances in the recovery of unconventional natural gas, particularly shale gas, have served to dramatically increase domestic production and reserve estimates for the United States and internationally. This trend has led to lowered prices and increased scrutiny on production practices. Questions have been raised as to how greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the life cycle of shale gas production and use compares with that of conventionally produced natural gas or other fuel sources such as coal. Recent literature has come to different conclusions on this point, largely due to differing assumptions, comparison baselines, and system boundaries. Through a meta-analytical procedure we call harmonization, we develop robust, analytically consistent, and updated comparisons of estimates of life cycle GHG emissions for electricity produced from shale gas, conventionally produced natural gas, and coal. On a per-unit electrical output basis, harmonization reveals that median estimates of GHG emissions from shale gas-generated electricity are similar to those for conventional natural gas, with both approximately half that of the central tendency of coal. Sensitivity analysis on the harmonized estimates indicates that assumptions regarding liquids unloading and estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) of wells have the greatest influence on life cycle GHG emissions, whereby shale gas life cycle GHG emissions could approach the range of best-performing coal-fired generation under certain scenarios. Despite clarification of published estimates through harmonization, these initial assessments should be confirmed through methane emissions measurements at components and in the atmosphere and through better characterization of EUR and practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  life cycle assessment; meta-analysis; methane leakage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25049378      PMCID: PMC4128108          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1309334111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  13 in total

1.  Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum.

Authors:  Andrew Burnham; Jeongwoo Han; Corrie E Clark; Michael Wang; Jennifer B Dunn; Ignasi Palou-Rivera
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals.

Authors:  Alexander E Farrell; Richard J Plevin; Brian T Turner; Andrew D Jones; Michael O'Hare; Daniel M Kammen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States.

Authors:  David T Allen; Vincent M Torres; James Thomas; David W Sullivan; Matthew Harrison; Al Hendler; Scott C Herndon; Charles E Kolb; Matthew P Fraser; A Daniel Hill; Brian K Lamb; Jennifer Miskimins; Robert F Sawyer; John H Seinfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Shale gas development impacts on surface water quality in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Sheila M Olmstead; Lucija A Muehlenbachs; Jhih-Shyang Shih; Ziyan Chu; Alan J Krupnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption of Marcellus shale gas.

Authors:  Ian J Laurenzi; Gilbert R Jersey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Stephen G Osborn; Avner Vengosh; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from United States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy.

Authors:  Aranya Venkatesh; Paulina Jaramillo; W Michael Griffin; H Scott Matthews
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 8.  Life cycle carbon footprint of shale gas: review of evidence and implications.

Authors:  Christopher L Weber; Christopher Clavin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.

Authors:  Xi Lu; Jackson Salovaara; Michael B McElroy
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions.

Authors:  Drew T Shindell; Greg Faluvegi; Dorothy M Koch; Gavin A Schmidt; Nadine Unger; Susanne E Bauer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  8 in total

1.  LCA Capability Roadmap: Product System Model Description and Revision.

Authors:  Brandon Kuczenski; Antonino Marvuglia; Miguel F Astudillo; Wesley W Ingwersen; M Barclay Satterfield; David P Evers; Christoph Koffler; Tomás Navarrete; Ben Amor; Lise Laurin
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.141

2.  Role of natural gas in meeting an electric sector emissions reduction strategy and effects on greenhouse gas emissions.

Authors:  Carol Lenox; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Energy Econ       Date:  2016

Review 3.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Energy use and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of drones for commercial package delivery.

Authors:  Joshuah K Stolaroff; Constantine Samaras; Emma R O'Neill; Alia Lubers; Alexandra S Mitchell; Daniel Ceperley
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom.

Authors:  Erin N Mayfield; Jared L Cohon; Nicholas Z Muller; Inês M L Azevedo; Allen L Robinson
Journal:  Nat Sustain       Date:  2019

7.  Incorporating upstream emissions into electric sector nitrogen oxide reduction targets.

Authors:  Samaneh Babaee; Daniel H Loughlin; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Clean Eng Technol       Date:  2020-12-01

8.  Sustainable development index of shale gas exploitation in China, the UK, and the US.

Authors:  Liang Li; Fan Wu; Yuanyu Cao; Fei Cheng; Dali Wang; Huizhen Li; Zhiqiang Yu; Jing You
Journal:  Environ Sci Ecotechnol       Date:  2022-07-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.