Literature DB >> 22107036

Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum.

Andrew Burnham1, Jeongwoo Han, Corrie E Clark, Michael Wang, Jennifer B Dunn, Ignasi Palou-Rivera.   

Abstract

The technologies and practices that have enabled the recent boom in shale gas production have also brought attention to the environmental impacts of its use. It has been debated whether the fugitive methane emissions during natural gas production and transmission outweigh the lower carbon dioxide emissions during combustion when compared to coal and petroleum. Using the current state of knowledge of methane emissions from shale gas, conventional natural gas, coal, and petroleum, we estimated up-to-date life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, we developed distribution functions for key parameters in each pathway to examine uncertainty and identify data gaps such as methane emissions from shale gas well completions and conventional natural gas liquid unloadings that need to be further addressed. Our base case results show that shale gas life-cycle emissions are 6% lower than conventional natural gas, 23% lower than gasoline, and 33% lower than coal. However, the range in values for shale and conventional gas overlap, so there is a statistical uncertainty whether shale gas emissions are indeed lower than conventional gas. Moreover, this life-cycle analysis, among other work in this area, provides insight on critical stages that the natural gas industry and government agencies can work together on to reduce the greenhouse gas footprint of natural gas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22107036     DOI: 10.1021/es201942m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  19 in total

1.  Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Stephen W Pacala; James J Winebrake; William L Chameides; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

4.  Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.

Authors:  Garvin A Heath; Patrick O'Donoughue; Douglas J Arent; Morgan Bazilian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies.

Authors:  Edgar G Hertwich; Thomas Gibon; Evert A Bouman; Anders Arvesen; Sangwon Suh; Garvin A Heath; Joseph D Bergesen; Andrea Ramirez; Mabel I Vega; Lei Shi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development.

Authors:  Dana R Caulton; Paul B Shepson; Renee L Santoro; Jed P Sparks; Robert W Howarth; Anthony R Ingraffea; Maria O L Cambaliza; Colm Sweeney; Anna Karion; Kenneth J Davis; Brian H Stirm; Stephen A Montzka; Ben R Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas.

Authors:  Haewon McJeon; Jae Edmonds; Nico Bauer; Leon Clarke; Brian Fisher; Brian P Flannery; Jérôme Hilaire; Volker Krey; Giacomo Marangoni; Raymond Mi; Keywan Riahi; Holger Rogner; Massimo Tavoni
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Unconventional oil and gas development and risk of childhood leukemia: Assessing the evidence.

Authors:  Elise G Elliott; Pauline Trinh; Xiaomei Ma; Brian P Leaderer; Mary H Ward; Nicole C Deziel
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Reduced salinity tolerance in the Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) is associated with rapid development of a gill interlamellar cell mass: implications of high-saline spills on native freshwater salmonids.

Authors:  Salvatore D Blair; Derrick Matheson; Yuhe He; Greg G Goss
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.079

10.  Design and Use of a Full Flow Sampling System (FFS) for the Quantification of Methane Emissions.

Authors:  Derek R Johnson; April N Covington; Nigel N Clark
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-06-12       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.