Literature DB >> 32632338

Role of natural gas in meeting an electric sector emissions reduction strategy and effects on greenhouse gas emissions.

Carol Lenox1, P Ozge Kaplan1.   

Abstract

With advances in natural gas extraction technologies, there is an increase in the availability of domestic natural gas, and natural gas is gaining a larger share of use as a fuel in electricity production. At the power plant, natural gas is a cleaner burning fuel than coal, but uncertainties exist in the amount of methane leakage occurring upstream in the extraction and production of natural gas. At higher leakage levels, the additional methane emissions could offset the carbon dioxide emissions reduction benefit of switching from coal to natural gas. This analysis uses the MARKAL linear optimization model to compare the carbon emissions profiles and system-wide global warming potential of the U.S. energy system over a series of model runs in which the power sector is required to meet a specific carbon dioxide reduction target across a number of scenarios in which the availability of natural gas changes. Scenarios are run with carbon dioxide emissions and a range of upstream methane emission leakage rates from natural gas production along with upstream methane and carbon dioxide emissions associated with production of coal and oil. While the system carbon dioxide emissions are reduced in most scenarios, total carbon dioxide equivalent emissions show an increase in scenarios in which natural gas prices remain low and, simultaneously, methane emissions from natural gas production are higher.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon emissions reductions; Energy system; Methane; Natural gas; Scenario analysis

Year:  2016        PMID: 32632338      PMCID: PMC7336527          DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Energy Econ        ISSN: 0140-9883


  12 in total

1.  Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Stephen W Pacala; James J Winebrake; William L Chameides; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States.

Authors:  David T Allen; Vincent M Torres; James Thomas; David W Sullivan; Matthew Harrison; Al Hendler; Scott C Herndon; Charles E Kolb; Matthew P Fraser; A Daniel Hill; Brian K Lamb; Jennifer Miskimins; Robert F Sawyer; John H Seinfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  GLIMPSE: a rapid decision framework for energy and environmental policy.

Authors:  Farhan H Akhtar; Robert W Pinder; Daniel H Loughlin; Daven K Henze
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.

Authors:  Garvin A Heath; Patrick O'Donoughue; Douglas J Arent; Morgan Bazilian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Energy and environment. Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems.

Authors:  A R Brandt; G A Heath; E A Kort; F O'Sullivan; G Pétron; S M Jordaan; P Tans; J Wilcox; A M Gopstein; D Arent; S Wofsy; N J Brown; R Bradley; G D Stucky; D Eardley; R Harriss
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Implications of shale gas development for climate change.

Authors:  Richard G Newell; Daniel Raimi
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development.

Authors:  Dana R Caulton; Paul B Shepson; Renee L Santoro; Jed P Sparks; Robert W Howarth; Anthony R Ingraffea; Maria O L Cambaliza; Colm Sweeney; Anna Karion; Kenneth J Davis; Brian H Stirm; Stephen A Montzka; Ben R Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from United States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy.

Authors:  Aranya Venkatesh; Paulina Jaramillo; W Michael Griffin; H Scott Matthews
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Life cycle carbon footprint of shale gas: review of evidence and implications.

Authors:  Christopher L Weber; Christopher Clavin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Modeling the relative GHG emissions of conventional and shale gas production.

Authors:  Trevor Stephenson; Jose Eduardo Valle; Xavier Riera-Palou
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  4 in total

1.  What is the role of distributed energy resources under scenarios of greenhouse gas reductions? A specific focus on combined heat and power systems in the industrial and commercial sectors.

Authors:  P Ozge Kaplan; Jonathan W Witt
Journal:  Appl Energy       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 9.746

2.  Transportation emissions scenarios for New York City under different carbon intensities of electricity and electric vehicle adoption rates.

Authors:  Mine Isik; Rebecca Dodder; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Nat Energy       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 60.858

3.  Incorporating upstream emissions into electric sector nitrogen oxide reduction targets.

Authors:  Samaneh Babaee; Daniel H Loughlin; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Clean Eng Technol       Date:  2020-12-01

4.  Understanding Technology, Fuel, Market and Policy Drivers for New York State's Power Sector Transformation.

Authors:  Mine Isik; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.251

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.