Literature DB >> 23479604

Shale gas development impacts on surface water quality in Pennsylvania.

Sheila M Olmstead1, Lucija A Muehlenbachs, Jhih-Shyang Shih, Ziyan Chu, Alan J Krupnick.   

Abstract

Concern has been raised in the scientific literature about the environmental implications of extracting natural gas from deep shale formations, and published studies suggest that shale gas development may affect local groundwater quality. The potential for surface water quality degradation has been discussed in prior work, although no empirical analysis of this issue has been published. The potential for large-scale surface water quality degradation has affected regulatory approaches to shale gas development in some US states, despite the dearth of evidence. This paper conducts a large-scale examination of the extent to which shale gas development activities affect surface water quality. Focusing on the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania, we estimate the effect of shale gas wells and the release of treated shale gas waste by permitted treatment facilities on observed downstream concentrations of chloride (Cl(-)) and total suspended solids (TSS), controlling for other factors. Results suggest that (i) the treatment of shale gas waste by treatment plants in a watershed raises downstream Cl(-) concentrations but not TSS concentrations, and (ii) the presence of shale gas wells in a watershed raises downstream TSS concentrations but not Cl(-) concentrations. These results can inform future voluntary measures taken by shale gas operators and policy approaches taken by regulators to protect surface water quality as the scale of this economically important activity increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23479604      PMCID: PMC3612605          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213871110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

1.  Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Stephen W Pacala; James J Winebrake; William L Chameides; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Warner; Robert B Jackson; Thomas H Darrah; Stephen G Osborn; Adrian Down; Kaiguang Zhao; Alissa White; Avner Vengosh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Increased salinization of fresh water in the northeastern United States.

Authors:  Sujay S Kaushal; Peter M Groffman; Gene E Likens; Kenneth T Belt; William P Stack; Victoria R Kelly; Lawrence E Band; Gary T Fisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Potential contaminant pathways from hydraulically fractured shale aquifers.

Authors:  James E Saiers; Erica Barth
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 2.671

5.  Water pollution risk associated with natural gas extraction from the Marcellus Shale.

Authors:  Daniel J Rozell; Sheldon J Reaven
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Stephen G Osborn; Avner Vengosh; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

  6 in total
  32 in total

1.  Synergies and Tradeoffs Among Environmental Impacts Under Conservation Planning of Shale Gas Surface Infrastructure.

Authors:  Austin W Milt; Tamara Gagnolet; Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Shale gas: Surface water also at risk.

Authors:  Guangming Zeng; Ming Chen; Zhuotong Zeng
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Impacts from above-ground activities in the eagle ford shale play on landscapes and hydrologic flows, La Salle County, Texas.

Authors:  Jon Paul Pierre; Charles J Abolt; Michael H Young
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  Multiple riparian-stream connections are predicted to change in response to salinization.

Authors:  Sally A Entrekin; Natalie A Clay; Anastasia Mogilevski; Brooke Howard-Parker; Michelle A Evans-White
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Unconventional natural gas development and hospitalizations: evidence from Pennsylvania, United States, 2003-2014.

Authors:  A Denham; M Willis; A Zavez; E Hill
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.427

8.  Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.

Authors:  Garvin A Heath; Patrick O'Donoughue; Douglas J Arent; Morgan Bazilian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A framework to predict the impacts of shale gas infrastructures on the forest fragmentation of an agroforest region.

Authors:  Alexandre Racicot; Véronique Babin-Roussel; Jean-François Dauphinais; Jean-Sébastien Joly; Pascal Noël; Claude Lavoie
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Neither Knowledge Deficit nor NIMBY: Understanding Opposition to Hydraulic Fracturing as a Nuanced Coalition in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania (USA).

Authors:  Danielle M McLaughlin; Bethany B Cutts
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.