Literature DB >> 24043804

Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States.

David T Allen1, Vincent M Torres, James Thomas, David W Sullivan, Matthew Harrison, Al Hendler, Scott C Herndon, Charles E Kolb, Matthew P Fraser, A Daniel Hill, Brian K Lamb, Jennifer Miskimins, Robert F Sawyer, John H Seinfeld.   

Abstract

Engineering estimates of methane emissions from natural gas production have led to varied projections of national emissions. This work reports direct measurements of methane emissions at 190 onshore natural gas sites in the United States (150 production sites, 27 well completion flowbacks, 9 well unloadings, and 4 workovers). For well completion flowbacks, which clear fractured wells of liquid to allow gas production, methane emissions ranged from 0.01 Mg to 17 Mg (mean = 1.7 Mg; 95% confidence bounds of 0.67-3.3 Mg), compared with an average of 81 Mg per event in the 2011 EPA national emission inventory from April 2013. Emission factors for pneumatic pumps and controllers as well as equipment leaks were both comparable to and higher than estimates in the national inventory. Overall, if emission factors from this work for completion flowbacks, equipment leaks, and pneumatic pumps and controllers are assumed to be representative of national populations and are used to estimate national emissions, total annual emissions from these source categories are calculated to be 957 Gg of methane (with sampling and measurement uncertainties estimated at ± 200 Gg). The estimate for comparable source categories in the EPA national inventory is ~1,200 Gg. Additional measurements of unloadings and workovers are needed to produce national emission estimates for these source categories. The 957 Gg in emissions for completion flowbacks, pneumatics, and equipment leaks, coupled with EPA national inventory estimates for other categories, leads to an estimated 2,300 Gg of methane emissions from natural gas production (0.42% of gross gas production).

Entities:  

Keywords:  greenhouse gas emissions; hydraulic fracturing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24043804      PMCID: PMC3816463          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1304880110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  10 in total

1.  Development of atmospheric tracer methods to measure methane emissions from natural gas facilities and urban areas.

Authors:  B K Lamb; J B McManus; J H Shorter; C E Kolb; B Mosher; R C Harriss; E Allwine; D Blaha; T Howard; A Guenther; R A Lott; R Siverson; H Westburg; P Zimmerman
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Stephen W Pacala; James J Winebrake; William L Chameides; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Natural gas plays in the Marcellus Shale: challenges and potential opportunities.

Authors:  David M Kargbo; Ron G Wilhelm; David J Campbell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Energy. Natural gas from shale bursts onto the scene.

Authors:  Richard A Kerr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Greenhouse gases: low methane leakage from gas pipelines.

Authors:  J Lelieveld; S Lechtenböhmer; S S Assonov; C A M Brenninkmeijer; C Dienst; M Fischedick; T Hanke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Human health risk assessment of air emissions from development of unconventional natural gas resources.

Authors:  Lisa M McKenzie; Roxana Z Witter; Lee S Newman; John L Adgate
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Regional air quality impacts of increased natural gas production and use in Texas.

Authors:  Adam P Pacsi; Nawaf S Alhajeri; Daniel Zavala-Araiza; Mort D Webster; David T Allen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption of Marcellus shale gas.

Authors:  Ian J Laurenzi; Gilbert R Jersey
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Stephen G Osborn; Avner Vengosh; Nathaniel R Warner; Robert B Jackson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality.

Authors:  R D Vidic; S L Brantley; J M Vandenbossche; D Yoxtheimer; J D Abad
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

  10 in total
  34 in total

1.  Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions.

Authors:  Daniel Zavala-Araiza; David R Lyon; Ramón A Alvarez; Kenneth J Davis; Robert Harriss; Scott C Herndon; Anna Karion; Eric Adam Kort; Brian K Lamb; Xin Lan; Anthony J Marchese; Stephen W Pacala; Allen L Robinson; Paul B Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Robert Talbot; Amy Townsend-Small; Tara I Yacovitch; Daniel J Zimmerle; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The importance of public health agency independence: Marcellus shale gas drilling in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Bernard D Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Direct measurements of methane emissions from abandoned oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Mary Kang; Cynthia M Kanno; Matthew C Reid; Xin Zhang; Denise L Mauzerall; Michael A Celia; Yuheng Chen; Tullis C Onstott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Role of natural gas in meeting an electric sector emissions reduction strategy and effects on greenhouse gas emissions.

Authors:  Carol Lenox; P Ozge Kaplan
Journal:  Energy Econ       Date:  2016

Review 5.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  A review of the public health impacts of unconventional natural gas development.

Authors:  P J Saunders; D McCoy; R Goldstein; A T Saunders; A Munroe
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 4.609

7.  Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation.

Authors:  Garvin A Heath; Patrick O'Donoughue; Douglas J Arent; Morgan Bazilian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The role of toxicological science in meeting the challenges and opportunities of hydraulic fracturing.

Authors:  Bernard D Goldstein; Bryan W Brooks; Steven D Cohen; Alexander E Gates; Michael E Honeycutt; John B Morris; Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta; Trevor M Penning; John Snawder
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development.

Authors:  Dana R Caulton; Paul B Shepson; Renee L Santoro; Jed P Sparks; Robert W Howarth; Anthony R Ingraffea; Maria O L Cambaliza; Colm Sweeney; Anna Karion; Kenneth J Davis; Brian H Stirm; Stephen A Montzka; Ben R Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Airborne methane remote measurements reveal heavy-tail flux distribution in Four Corners region.

Authors:  Christian Frankenberg; Andrew K Thorpe; David R Thompson; Glynn Hulley; Eric Adam Kort; Nick Vance; Jakob Borchardt; Thomas Krings; Konstantin Gerilowski; Colm Sweeney; Stephen Conley; Brian D Bue; Andrew D Aubrey; Simon Hook; Robert O Green
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.