Literature DB >> 27708291

Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database.

Stefan Schwietzke1,2, Owen A Sherwood3, Lori M P Bruhwiler2, John B Miller1,2, Giuseppe Etiope4,5, Edward J Dlugokencky2, Sylvia Englund Michel3, Victoria A Arling1,2, Bruce H Vaughn3, James W C White3, Pieter P Tans2.   

Abstract

Methane has the second-largest global radiative forcing impact of anthropogenic greenhouse gases after carbon dioxide, but our understanding of the global atmospheric methane budget is incomplete. The global fossil fuel industry (production and usage of natural gas, oil and coal) is thought to contribute 15 to 22 per cent of methane emissions to the total atmospheric methane budget. However, questions remain regarding methane emission trends as a result of fossil fuel industrial activity and the contribution to total methane emissions of sources from the fossil fuel industry and from natural geological seepage, which are often co-located. Here we re-evaluate the global methane budget and the contribution of the fossil fuel industry to methane emissions based on long-term global methane and methane carbon isotope records. We compile the largest isotopic methane source signature database so far, including fossil fuel, microbial and biomass-burning methane emission sources. We find that total fossil fuel methane emissions (fossil fuel industry plus natural geological seepage) are not increasing over time, but are 60 to 110 per cent greater than current estimates owing to large revisions in isotope source signatures. We show that this is consistent with the observed global latitudinal methane gradient. After accounting for natural geological methane seepage, we find that methane emissions from natural gas, oil and coal production and their usage are 20 to 60 per cent greater than inventories. Our findings imply a greater potential for the fossil fuel industry to mitigate anthropogenic climate forcing, but we also find that methane emissions from natural gas as a fraction of production have declined from approximately 8 per cent to approximately 2 per cent over the past three decades.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27708291     DOI: 10.1038/nature19797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  6 in total

1.  Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure.

Authors:  Ramón A Alvarez; Stephen W Pacala; James J Winebrake; William L Chameides; Steven P Hamburg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Microbial methanogenesis in subsurface oil and coal.

Authors:  Margaux Meslé; Gilles Dromart; Philippe Oger
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.992

3.  Natural gas fugitive emissions rates constrained by global atmospheric methane and ethane.

Authors:  Stefan Schwietzke; W Michael Griffin; H Scott Matthews; Lori M P Bruhwiler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  A 21st-century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by ¹³CH₄.

Authors:  Hinrich Schaefer; Sara E Mikaloff Fletcher; Cordelia Veidt; Keith R Lassey; Gordon W Brailsford; Tony M Bromley; Edward J Dlugokencky; Sylvia E Michel; John B Miller; Ingeborg Levin; Dave C Lowe; Ross J Martin; Bruce H Vaughn; James W C White
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability.

Authors:  P Bousquet; P Ciais; J B Miller; E J Dlugokencky; D A Hauglustaine; C Prigent; G R Van der Werf; P Peylin; E-G Brunke; C Carouge; R L Langenfelds; J Lathière; F Papa; M Ramonet; M Schmidt; L P Steele; S C Tyler; J White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Natural and anthropogenic variations in methane sources during the past two millennia.

Authors:  C J Sapart; G Monteil; M Prokopiou; R S W van de Wal; J O Kaplan; P Sperlich; K M Krumhardt; C van der Veen; S Houweling; M C Krol; T Blunier; T Sowers; P Martinerie; E Witrant; D Dahl-Jensen; T Röckmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 49.962

  6 in total
  36 in total

1.  The role of biology in global climate change: Interdisciplinary research in biogeochemistry can help to understand local and global fluxes of carbon and other elements and inform environmental policies.

Authors:  Philip Hunter
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Biogeochemistry: Rebalancing the global methane budget.

Authors:  Grant Allen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Large changes in biomass burning over the last millennium inferred from paleoatmospheric ethane in polar ice cores.

Authors:  Melinda R Nicewonger; Murat Aydin; Michael J Prather; Eric S Saltzman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evaluation of different samplers and storage temperature effect on the methane carbon stable isotope analysis.

Authors:  Victor H J M Dos Santos; Diane O Laroque; Caroline I Baum; Pâmela de M Engelmann; Rogério V Lourega; Luiz F Rodrigues
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Global methane emissions from coal mining to continue growing even with declining coal production.

Authors:  Nazar Kholod; Meredydd Evans; Raymond C Pilcher; Volha Roshchanka; Felicia Ruiz; Michael Coté; Ron Collings
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 9.297

6.  Enhanced response of global wetland methane emissions to the 2015-2016 El Niño-Southern Oscillation event.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Niklaus E Zimmermann; Leonardo Calle; George Hurtt; Abhishek Chatterjee; Benjamin Poulter
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 6.793

7.  Atmospheric science: Ancient ice and the global methane cycle.

Authors:  Peter Hopcroft
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Minimal geological methane emissions during the Younger Dryas-Preboreal abrupt warming event.

Authors:  Vasilii V Petrenko; Andrew M Smith; Hinrich Schaefer; Katja Riedel; Edward Brook; Daniel Baggenstos; Christina Harth; Quan Hua; Christo Buizert; Adrian Schilt; Xavier Fain; Logan Mitchell; Thomas Bauska; Anais Orsi; Ray F Weiss; Jeffrey P Severinghaus
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl.

Authors:  Alexander J Turner; Christian Frankenberg; Paul O Wennberg; Daniel J Jacob
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Glacial/interglacial wetland, biomass burning, and geologic methane emissions constrained by dual stable isotopic CH4 ice core records.

Authors:  Michael Bock; Jochen Schmitt; Jonas Beck; Barbara Seth; Jérôme Chappellaz; Hubertus Fischer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.