Literature DB >> 22477148

Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Monica Pivetti1, Giannino Melotti.   

Abstract

Despite the increase in popularity of prenatal genetic testing, relatively little is known about the role psychological factors play in the decision-making process. In this analogue study, a sample of Italian female university students was used to investigate determining factors that predict the intention of undergoing prenatal genetic testing. Structural Equation Modelling was used to describe the dynamic interplay between knowledge, beliefs, attitudes and health-related behaviour such as prenatal genetic testing. Following the Theory of Reasoned Action, three dimensions predicted the intention to undergo prenatal genetic testing: the need for more scientific information, a positive attitude towards genetic testing, and the inclination to terminate pregnancy after receiving a positive test result. Results showed that less religious women tended to be more in favour of prenatal tests and in undertaking such tests. This preliminary study provides genetic counsellors and policy makers with a clearer picture of their clients' motives and attitudes behind the decision-making process of prenatal genetic testing, contributing to improving both the communication process between counsellors and their clients and the organization of genetic services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22477148     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-012-9498-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  54 in total

1.  Male partners' role in Latinas' amniocentesis decisions.

Authors:  Carole H Browner; H Mabel Preloran
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genetic counseling gone awry: miscommunication between prenatal genetic service providers and Mexican-origin clients.

Authors:  C H Browner; H Mabel Preloran; Maria Christina Casado; Harold N Bass; Ann P Walker
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI.

Authors:  R C MacCallum; S Hong
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations.

Authors:  Diana S Catz; Nancy S Green; Jonathan N Tobin; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Penny Kyler; Ann Umemoto; Jennifer Cernoch; Roxane Brown; Fredericka Wolman
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2005

5.  Racial-ethnic differences in genetic amniocentesis uptake.

Authors:  Jennifer B Saucier; Dennis Johnston; Catherine A Wicklund; Patricia Robbins-Furman; Jacqueline T Hecht; Manju Monga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a survey of willingness in women and family physicians to engage in shared decision-making.

Authors:  France Légaré; Sylvie St-Jacques; Susie Gagnon; Merlin Njoya; Michel Brisson; Pierre Frémont; François Rousseau
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Medical and lay attitudes towards genetic screening and testing in Finland.

Authors:  Hanna Toiviainen; Piia Jallinoja; Arja R Aro; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Attitudes towards and beliefs about genetic testing in the haemophilia community: a qualitative study.

Authors:  S Thomas; D Herbert; A Street; C Barnes; J Boal; P Komesaroff
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.287

9.  Attitudes toward the acceptability of reasons for pregnancy termination due to fetal abnormalities among prenatal care providers and consumers in Israel.

Authors:  Anat Mishori Dery; Rivka Carmi; Ilana Shoham Vardi
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 10.  Educating the general public about multifactorial genetic disease: applying a theory-based framework to understand current public knowledge.

Authors:  Chris M R Smerecnik; Ilse Mesters; Nanne K de Vries; Hein de Vries
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  10 in total

1.  The Moral Reasoning of Genetic Dilemmas Amongst Jewish Israeli Undergraduate Students with Different Religious Affiliations and Scientific Backgrounds.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Reproductive health choices for young adults with sickle cell disease or trait: randomized controlled trial immediate posttest effects.

Authors:  Diana J Wilkie; Agatha M Gallo; Yingwei Yao; Robert E Molokie; Christine Stahl; Patricia E Hershberger; Zhongsheng Zhao; Marie L Suarez; Robert J Labotka; Bonnye Johnson; Rigo Angulo; Veronica Angulo; Jesus Carrasco; David Shuey; Stephanie Pelligra; Edward Wang; Dennie T Rogers; Alexis A Thompson
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Reproductive Health CHOICES for Young Adults with Sickle Cell Disease or Trait: Randomized Controlled Trial Outcomes over Two Years.

Authors:  Agatha M Gallo; Diana J Wilkie; Yingwei Yao; Robert E Molokie; Christiane Stahl; Patricia E Hershberger; Zhongsheng Zhao; Marie L Suarez; Bonnye Johnson; Rigoberto Angulo; Jesus Carrasco; Veronica Angulo; Alexis A Thompson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Attitudes Toward and Uptake of Prenatal Genetic Screening and Testing in Twin Pregnancies.

Authors:  Kathryn M Reese; Jennifer Czerwinski; Sandra Darilek; Anthony Johnson; Malorie Jones; Claire N Singletary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Managing Couple Conflict During Prenatal Counseling Sessions: An Investigation of Genetic Counselor Experiences and Perceptions.

Authors:  Kara Schoeffel; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Karol Rubin; Bonnie LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Should I Perform Genetic Testing? A Qualitative Look into the Decision Making Considerations of Religious Israeli Undergraduate Students.

Authors:  Merav Siani; Orit Ben-Zvi Assaraf
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  A qualitative inquiry of the financial concerns of couples opting to use preimplantation genetic diagnosis to prevent the transmission of known genetic disorders.

Authors:  Kathryn T Drazba; Michele A Kelley; Patricia E Hershberger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Eliciting women's preference for prenatal testing in China: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Liangzhi Wu; Yanxin Wu; Shiqian Zou; Cong Sun; Junyu Chen; Xueyan Li; Zihang Lin; Lizhi Guan; Qing Zeng; Sihan Zhao; Jingtong Liang; Rui Chen; Zhiwen Hu; Kingyan Au; Daipeng Xie; Xiaomin Xiao; Wai-Kit Ming
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Hedonic and eudaimonic well-being during the COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: The role of stigma and appraisals.

Authors:  F Giorgia Paleari; Monica Pivetti; Desirèe Galati; Frank D Fincham
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2021-01-18

10.  The good, the bad, and the utilitarian: attitudes towards genetic testing and implications for disability.

Authors:  Alexandra Maftei; Oana Dănilă
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-01-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.