Literature DB >> 15959650

Racial-ethnic differences in genetic amniocentesis uptake.

Jennifer B Saucier1, Dennis Johnston, Catherine A Wicklund, Patricia Robbins-Furman, Jacqueline T Hecht, Manju Monga.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the role of health beliefs in genetic amniocentesis acceptance in a diverse racial-ethnic population. Participants completed a previously-validated questionnaire consisting of three sections: (1) demographics, (2) amniocentesis knowledge, and (3) health beliefs, which assessed perceived susceptibility, seriousness of potential impact, benefits of testing, and barriers to testing. The results showed that Hispanic women were less likely to accept amniocentesis (51.5% vs. Caucasian 82.8%, African American 82.9%, Asian 82.8%). Education level was the only demographic factor higher among acceptors. Women who accepted amniocentesis had higher perceived seriousness, susceptibility, and benefits HBM scores and higher knowledge scores than women who declined. HBM scores and knowledge predicted the amniocentesis decision correctly 91.5% of the time. Individual health beliefs and knowledge play a greater role in genetic amniocentesis acceptance than do demographic factors such as race-ethnicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15959650     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-005-0641-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  19 in total

1.  Differences between black and white women in the use of prenatal care technologies.

Authors:  Kate M Brett; Kenneth C Schoendorf; John L Kiely
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions: are there racial/ethnic differences?

Authors:  Lee A Learman; Miriam Kuppermann; Elena Gates; Robert F Nease; Virginia Gildengorin; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.908

3.  Evaluation of the Health Belief Model and decision making regarding amniocentesis in women of advanced maternal age.

Authors:  B N French; T W Kurczynski; M T Weaver; M J Pituch
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1992

4.  Some problems with social cognition models: a pragmatic and conceptual analysis.

Authors:  Jane Ogden
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.267

Review 5.  White, European, Western, Caucasian, or what? Inappropriate labeling in research on race, ethnicity, and health.

Authors:  R Bhopal; L Donaldson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Factors in a woman's decision to undergo genetic amniocentesis for advanced maternal age.

Authors:  B L Davies; T A Doran
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1982 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Acceptance of amniocentesis by low-income patients in an urban hospital.

Authors:  J P Marion; G Kassam; P M Fernhoff; K E Brantley; L Carroll; J Zacharias; L Klein; J H Priest; L J Elsas
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Ethnicity, bioethics, and prenatal diagnosis: the amniocentesis decisions of Mexican-origin women and their partners.

Authors:  C H Browner; H M Preloran; S J Cox
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Racial-ethnic differences in prenatal diagnostic test use and outcomes: preferences, socioeconomics, or patient knowledge?

Authors:  M Kuppermann; E Gates; A E Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Access to reproductive genetic services for low-income women and women of color.

Authors:  Laurie Nsiah-Jefferson
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.587

View more
  12 in total

1.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Awareness and attitudes regarding prenatal testing among Texas women of childbearing age.

Authors:  Amy P Case; Tunu A Ramadhani; Mark A Canfield; Catherine A Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Informed Decision-Making in the Context of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray.

Authors:  Jessica Baker; Cheryl Shuman; David Chitayat; Syed Wasim; Nan Okun; Johannes Keunen; Renee Hofstedter; Rachel Silver
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Exploring the role of religiosity and spirituality in amniocentesis decision-making among Latinas.

Authors:  Sarah Guerra Seth; Thomas Goka; Andrea Harbison; Lisa Hollier; Susan Peterson; Lois Ramondetta; Sarah Jane Noblin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis: pregnant women's interest and expected uptake.

Authors:  Reana Tischler; Louanne Hudgins; Yair J Blumenfeld; Henry T Greely; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Creating accessible Spanish language materials for Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research consortium genomic projects: challenges and lessons learned.

Authors:  Nangel M Lindberg; Amanda M Gutierrez; Kathleen F Mittendorf; Michelle A Ramos; Beatriz Anguiano; Frank Angelo; Galen Joseph
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 2.119

7.  "What is this genetics, anyway?" Understandings of genetics, illness causality and inheritance among British Pakistani users of genetic services.

Authors:  Alison Shaw; Jane A Hurst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Genetic counseling and testing for Asian Americans: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer L Young; Julie Mak; Talia Stanley; Michelle Bass; Mildred K Cho; Holly K Tabor
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Risk and reproductive decisions: British Pakistani couples' responses to genetic counselling.

Authors:  Alison Shaw
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  The good, the bad, and the utilitarian: attitudes towards genetic testing and implications for disability.

Authors:  Alexandra Maftei; Oana Dănilă
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.