Literature DB >> 26788758

Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI.

R C MacCallum, S Hong.   

Abstract

Extending earlier work by MacCallum, Browne, and Sugawara (1996), procedures are shown for conducting power analysis of tests of overall fit of covariance structure models when null and alternative levels of model fit are specified in terms of values of the GFI or AGFl fit indexes. Results show that for GFI-based power analyses, holding null and alternative values of GFI fixed, power decreases as degrees of freedom increase, which is a counter-intuitive and undesirable phenomenon indicating lower power for detecting false null hypotheses about simpler models. For AGFI-based analyses, power increases as degrees of freedom increase. However, for both indexes it is shown that it is problematic to establish consistently appropriate values for null and alternative hypotheses about model fit. Because of these problems, it is recommended that the RMSEA index is preferable as a basis for power analysis and model evaluation.

Year:  1997        PMID: 26788758     DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  22 in total

1.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Emotionless holism: factor and Rasch analysis of the Chinese Integrative Medicine Attitude Questionnaire.

Authors:  Vincent Chung; Marc Chong; Lau Chun Hong; Polly H X Ma; Samuel Y S Wong; Sian M Griffiths
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Using Structural Equation Modeling to Assess Functional Connectivity in the Brain: Power and Sample Size Considerations.

Authors:  Georgios Sideridis; Panagiotis Simos; Andrew Papanicolaou; Jack Fletcher
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  GW-SEM: A Statistical Package to Conduct Genome-Wide Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Brad Verhulst; Hermine H Maes; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  A Reevaluation of the Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Spiritual Well-Being Questionnaire (SWBQ).

Authors:  Rapson Gomez; Shaun Watson
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2022-08-05

6.  Design of an Interactive Mind Calligraphy System by Affective Computing and Visualization Techniques for Real-Time Reflections of the Writer's Emotions.

Authors:  Chao-Ming Wang; Yu-Chen Chen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models.

Authors:  Goran Pavlov; Alberto Maydeu-Olivares; Dexin Shi
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  An Improved Stress-Scale Specifically Designed to Measure Stress of Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tso-Ying Lee; Shih-Chun Hsing; Chin-Ching Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Genetic randomization reveals functional relationships among morphologic and tissue-quality traits that contribute to bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Bin Hu; Steven M Tommasini; Hayden-William Courtland; Christopher Price; Carl J Terranova; Joseph H Nadeau
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 2.957

10.  Reliability and Validity of the European Child Environment Questionnaire (ECEQ) in Children and Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy: Persian Version.

Authors:  Mahyar Salavati; Roshanak Vameghi; Seyed Ali Hosseini; Ahmad Saeedi; Masoud Gharib
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.