Literature DB >> 16113533

Attitudes about genetics in underserved, culturally diverse populations.

Diana S Catz1, Nancy S Green, Jonathan N Tobin, Michele A Lloyd-Puryear, Penny Kyler, Ann Umemoto, Jennifer Cernoch, Roxane Brown, Fredericka Wolman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: New medical discoveries regarding genetic susceptibility to common chronic diseases, and the decoding of the human genome have increased public attention to genetics. What information is understood and what attitudes exist towards genetics and genetic research have not been well examined in underserved, culturally diverse communities.
METHODS: To better understand attitudes and beliefs towards genetics and genetic testing in these groups, we conducted eight focus groups with 55 patients and health care workers in New York City and Westchester, N.Y., in English, Spanish, and Chinese.
RESULTS: Focus group participants had limited understanding about genetics or genetic testing. Newborn screening was the least-known genetic issue, even among health care workers. Regardless of their cultural group, most participants expressed a desire for more information about genetics and genetic tests. Latinos and Chinese participants generally expressed positive attitudes towards genetic studies and genetic testing, with the possibility of preventing diseases cited as the main advantage. Black Americans and Non-Hispanic Whites reported mixed feelings about genetic research and genetic testing. Concerns expressed included: anxiety before receiving test results or waiting for a disease to develop, fear of genetic discrimination by health and life insurance companies and employers, not having the financial means to deal with genetic diseases in themselves or a sick child, concern that children and adults are having too many tests. Black Americans expressed the most concern for possibly harmful use of genetic information.
CONCLUSIONS: Minority populations of diverse cultures have limited knowledge about genetics and genetic testing, would like to have more information, and are not well reached by the current educational approaches. Participants knew the least about newborn screening, a test that is mandatory in the New York State. While genetic knowledge by minority populations was perhaps not different from the level of knowledge of consumers in general, minority populations are at particular risk of being left behind because of historically poor access to information and services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16113533     DOI: 10.1159/000086759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Genet        ISSN: 1422-2795


  61 in total

1.  Evaluation findings from genetics and family health history community-based workshops for African Americans.

Authors:  Jo-Anne Manswell Butty; Finie Richardson; Charles P Mouton; Charmaine D M Royal; Rodney D Green; Kerry-Ann Munroe
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-11-05

2.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Civilian and military genetics: nondiscrimination policy in a post-GINA world.

Authors:  Susannah Baruch; Kathy Hudson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing: a review.

Authors:  Z Lohn; S Adam; P H Birch; J M Friedman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.

Authors:  J O'Daniel; S B Haga
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 7.  Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

8.  What's at stake? Genetic information from the perspective of people with epilepsy and their family members.

Authors:  Sara Shostak; Dana Zarhin; Ruth Ottman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Ethnicity, educational level and attitudes contribute to parental intentions about genetic testing for child obesity.

Authors:  Paul L Kocken; Meinou H C Theunissen; Yvonne Schönbeck; Lidewij Henneman; A Cecile J W Janssens; Symone B Detmar
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-02-07

10.  Views on personalized medicine: do the attitudes of African American and white prescription drug consumers differ?

Authors:  M De Marco; S Cykert; N Coad; K Doost; J Schaal; B White; D Young; M R Isler; G Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.