Literature DB >> 21268046

Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: a survey of willingness in women and family physicians to engage in shared decision-making.

France Légaré1, Sylvie St-Jacques, Susie Gagnon, Merlin Njoya, Michel Brisson, Pierre Frémont, François Rousseau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the willingness of women and their family physicians (FPs) to engage in shared decision-making (SDM) as regards prenatal Down-syndrome screening and the factors that might influence their willingness to do so.
METHODS: We conducted a survey of participants in Québec City, Canada, using the theory of planned behavior. We used a general linear model and multilevel approach that took the fact that some women consulted the same FP into account.
RESULTS: This study comprised 109 pregnant women and 41 FPs. On a scale of - 3 to + 3, the pregnant women's and FPs' response scores were, respectively, 2.11 ± 1.38 and 2.66 ± 0.40. In women, attitude, significant others, self-efficacy, perceived moral correctness, and their FP's attitude influenced their willingness to engage in SDM. However, women without a post-secondary education were less likely to engage in SDM than women with a post-secondary education, mostly because the former lacked a sense of self-efficacy. In FPs, only attitude and significant others influenced their willingness to engage in SDM.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the women and their FPs wished to engage in SDM as regards prenatal Down-syndrome screening. Only a few factors influenced this desire which therefore may be modifiable.
Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21268046     DOI: 10.1002/pd.2624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  24 in total

1.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Patients' perceptions of sharing in decisions: a systematic review of interventions to enhance shared decision making in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  France Légaré; Stéphane Turcotte; Dawn Stacey; Stéphane Ratté; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Shared Decision-Making During Inpatient Rounds: Opportunities for Improvement in Patient Engagement and Communication.

Authors:  Rebecca Blankenburg; Joan F Hilton; Patrick Yuan; Stephanie Rennke; Brad Monash; Stephanie M Harman; Debbie S Sakai; Poonam Hosamani; Adeena Khan; Ian Chua; Eric Huynh; Lisa Shieh; Lijia Xie
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Perceptions of shared decision making and decision aids among rural primary care clinicians.

Authors:  Valerie J King; Melinda M Davis; Paul N Gorman; J Bruin Rugge; L J Fagnan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mylène Badeau; Carmen Lindsay; Jonatan Blais; Leon Nshimyumukiza; Yemisi Takwoingi; Sylvie Langlois; France Légaré; Yves Giguère; Alexis F Turgeon; William Witteman; François Rousseau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

6.  The impact of DECISION+2 on patient intention to engage in shared decision making: secondary analysis of a multicentre clustered randomized trial.

Authors:  Nicolas Couët; Michel Labrecque; Hubert Robitaille; Stéphane Turcotte; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Exploration of shared decision-making processes among dieticians and patients during a consultation for the nutritional treatment of dyslipidaemia.

Authors:  Hugues Vaillancourt; France Légaré; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Annie Lapointe; Sarah-Maude Deschênes; Sophie Desroches
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  What women want: lead considerations for current and future applications of noninvasive prenatal testing in prenatal care.

Authors:  Ruth M Farrell; Patricia K Agatisa; Benjamin Nutter
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  Theory-based approach to developing an implementation plan to support the adoption of a patient decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening.

Authors:  Titilayo Tatiana Agbadjé; Matthew Menear; Marie-Pierre Gagnon; France Légaré
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Shared decision making does not influence physicians against clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Mireille Guerrier; France Légaré; Stéphane Turcotte; Michel Labrecque; Louis-Paul Rivest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.