Literature DB >> 29525932

Attitudes Toward and Uptake of Prenatal Genetic Screening and Testing in Twin Pregnancies.

Kathryn M Reese1, Jennifer Czerwinski1,2, Sandra Darilek3, Anthony Johnson2, Malorie Jones1,2, Claire N Singletary4,5,6.   

Abstract

The rate of twinning is rising and since the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing, interest in and uptake of genetic screening and testing in twin pregnancies has not been investigated. This study aimed to explore the attitudes toward and uptake of current prenatal genetic screening and diagnostic testing options for fetal aneuploidy in twin pregnancies. Women being seen for genetic counseling with twin gestations were recruited for participation in a descriptive study with questionnaire (n = 42) and semi-structured phone interview (n = 15). Women were significantly more in favor of screening than diagnostic testing (p = 0.049). Sixty-nine (n = 25) percent elected screening, while one participant had a diagnostic procedure. Women were interested in screening for preparation or reassurance despite having concerns about accuracy and uncertainty. Most women (86%) felt they would make the same decision in a singleton pregnancy. Despite this, 48% cited twin pregnancy as influential to some degree. Information learned from providers, past experiences, and family and friends were also cited as influencing and anchoring factors, suggesting that tailoring prenatal genetic counseling sessions for twins might parallel that of singletons. No significant differences between natural and assisted conception patients were found. Although it did not alter patient decisions, genetic counseling was used as a platform to raise concerns and gather information.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; Prenatal genetic counseling; Prenatal genetic testing; Twin pregnancies; Uptake

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29525932     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0246-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  18 in total

1.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Aneuploidy in twin gestations: when is maternal age advanced?

Authors:  C Meyers; R Adam; J Dungan; V Prenger
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Practice Bulletin No. 163 Summary: Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Prenatal screening and diagnosis of aneuploidy in multiple pregnancies.

Authors:  Alain Gagnon; Francois Audibert
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 5.237

Review 5.  Psychological impact of infertility.

Authors:  Tara M Cousineau; Alice D Domar
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.237

6.  Amniocentesis and the risk of second trimester fetal loss in twin pregnancies: results from a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Natalia Lenis-Cordoba; María Ángeles Sánchez; Juan Carlos Bello-Muñoz; Juan Sagalá-Martinez; Nazareth Campos; Elena Carreras-Moratonas; Lluis Cabero-Roura
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-05-07

7.  Pregnancy loss rate after mid-trimester amniocentesis in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Alison G Cahill; George A Macones; David M Stamilio; Jeffrey M Dicke; James P Crane; Anthony O Odibo
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Prospective study of parental choice for aneuploidy screening in assisted conception versus spontaneously conceived twins.

Authors:  Anna Holmes; Eric Jauniaux
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.828

9.  Attitudes towards non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy among US adults of reproductive age.

Authors:  M Allyse; L C Sayres; T A Goodspeed; M K Cho
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 10.  Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sian Taylor-Phillips; Karoline Freeman; Julia Geppert; Adeola Agbebiyi; Olalekan A Uthman; Jason Madan; Angus Clarke; Siobhan Quenby; Aileen Clarke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

1.  Perspectives of Pregnant People and Clinicians on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Meredith Vanstone; Alexandra Cernat; Umair Majid; Forum Trivedi; Chanté De Freitas
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

2.  Attitude changes toward prenatal testing among women with twin pregnancies after the introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing: A single-center study in Japan.

Authors:  Masanobu Ogawa; Yasuyuki Hasuo; Yumiko Taura; Ryosuke Tsunematsu; Sawako Shikada; Yuki Matsushita; Kazuo Sato
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 1.697

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.