Literature DB >> 12650730

Genetic counseling gone awry: miscommunication between prenatal genetic service providers and Mexican-origin clients.

C H Browner1, H Mabel Preloran, Maria Christina Casado, Harold N Bass, Ann P Walker.   

Abstract

Amniocentesis, and other prenatal genetic tests, have become a well-established feature of modern prenatal care. But these tests place a considerable decision-making burden on the expectant mothers to whom they are offered: the genetic issues involved are complex and the appropriate course of action sometimes ambiguous. Genetic counseling aims to help pregnant clients make an informed decision about prenatal genetic tests. But the clientele of prenatal genetic counseling has changed significantly in the years since the practice was established. Clients were once a self-selected group of women well-informed about the genetic services being offered. In contrast, clients now include an increasing number of women, particularly ethnic minority women, who had no prior knowledge of genetic testing, but were found to be at risk of birth defects after routine screening. Little is known about how well genetic counseling serves the needs of this new clientele. This paper investigates the possibility that miscommunication between genetic counselors and their Mexican-origin clients contributed to the higher rates of amniocentesis refusal. We interviewed 156 pregnant Mexican-origin women who screened positive on a blood test routinely offered in California to detect birth defects. We also observed the genetics consultations of a sub-sample of the women. We identified five common sources of miscommunication: (1) Medical jargon; (2) The non-directive nature of counseling; (3) The inhibitions of counselors stemming from misplaced cultural sensitivity; (4) Problems of translation; (5) Problems of trust. We found that many Mexican-origin women are skeptical of genetic testing and do not easily surrender their own lay theories about the causes of their condition. In order to dislodge the misunderstandings of their clients, counselors must give clients the opportunity to air their own views, however contrary to those of genetics professionals these may be.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12650730     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00214-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  37 in total

1.  Prenatal genetic testing: an investigation of determining factors affecting the decision-making process.

Authors:  Monica Pivetti; Giannino Melotti
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 2.  Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California.

Authors:  Alexandra Minna Stern
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Acculturation and cross-border utilization of health services.

Authors:  Dejun Su; Daphne Wang
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2012-08

5.  Working with the Hmong Population in a Genetics Setting: Genetic Counselor Perspectives.

Authors:  Aime Agather; Jennifer Rietzler; Catherine A Reiser; Elizabeth M Petty
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  To worry or not to worry: breast cancer genetic counseling communication with low-income Latina immigrants.

Authors:  Galen Joseph; Claudia Guerra
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-08-23

7.  An assessment of risk understanding in Hispanic genetic counseling patients.

Authors:  Jennifer N Eichmeyer; Hope Northrup; Michael A Assel; Thomas J Goka; Dennis A Johnston; Aimee Tucker Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Effective communication in the era of precision medicine: A pilot intervention with low health literacy patients to improve genetic counseling communication.

Authors:  Galen Joseph; Robin Lee; Rena J Pasick; Claudia Guerra; Dean Schillinger; Sara Rubin
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Advances in medical technology and creation of disparities: the case of Down syndrome.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Catherine De Vigan; Véronique Vodovar; Gérard Bréart; François Goffinet; Béatrice Blondel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Challenges faced by genetics service providers' practicing in a culturally and linguistically diverse population: an Australian experience.

Authors:  Mona Saleh; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Bettina Meiser; Ian Muchamore
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.