Literature DB >> 22468723

Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.

Jason T Arita1, Nancy B Carlisle, Geoffrey F Woodman.   

Abstract

Theories of attention are compatible with the idea that we can bias attention to avoid selecting objects that have known nontarget features. Although this may underlie several existing phenomena, the explicit guidance of attention away from known nontargets has yet to be demonstrated. Here we show that observers can use feature cues (i.e., color) to bias attention away from nontarget items during visual search. These negative cues were used to quickly instantiate a template for rejection that reliably facilitated search across the cue-to-search stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), although negative cues were not as potent as cues that guide attention toward target features. Furthermore, by varying the search set size we show a template for rejection is increasingly effective in facilitating search as scene complexity increases. Our findings demonstrate that knowing what not to look for can be used to configure attention to avoid certain features, complimenting what is known about setting attention to select certain target features.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22468723      PMCID: PMC3817824          DOI: 10.1037/a0027885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Visual marking: dissociating effects of new and old set size.

Authors:  Yuhong Jiang; Marvin M Chun; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  An instance theory of attention and memory.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Visual marking inhibits singleton capture.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Setting up the target template in visual search.

Authors:  Timothy J Vickery; Li-Wei King; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.

Authors:  D G Watson; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.

Authors:  Claus Bundesen; Thomas Habekost; Soren Kyllingsbaek
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  51 in total

1.  How visual working memory contents influence priming of visual attention.

Authors:  Nancy B Carlisle; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-04-12

2.  Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Markus Conci; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Gaze dynamics of feature-based distractor inhibition under prior-knowledge and expectations.

Authors:  Wen Wen; Yangming Zhang; Sheng Li
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Where do we store the memory representations that guide attention?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Nancy B Carlisle; Robert M G Reinhart
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The guidance of attention by templates for rejection during visual search.

Authors:  Nick Berggren; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.

Authors:  Suk Won Han
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-09-04

Review 7.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-29

8.  Optimizing perception: Attended and ignored stimuli create opposing perceptual biases.

Authors:  Mohsen Rafiei; Sabrina Hansmann-Roth; David Whitney; Árni Kristjánsson; Andrey Chetverikov
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Passive exposure attenuates distraction during visual search.

Authors:  Bo-Yeong Won; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-04-06

10.  Oculomotor Inhibition of Salient Distractors: Voluntary Inhibition Cannot Override Selection History.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; John M Gaspar; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2019-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.