Literature DB >> 9009881

Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects.

D G Watson1, G W Humphreys.   

Abstract

The authors propose a new mechanism for prioritizing the selection of new events: visual marking. In a modified conjunction search task the authors presented one set of distractors before the remaining items, which contained the target if present. Search was as efficient as if only the second items were presented. This held when eye movements were prevented and required a gap of 400 ms between the old and new items. The effect was abolished by luminance changes at old distractor locations when the new items appeared, and it was reduced by the addition of an attention demanding load task. The authors propose that old items can be ignored by spatially parallel, top-down attentional inhibition applied to the locations of static stimuli. The authors discuss the relations between marking and other accounts of visual selection and potential neurophysiological mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9009881     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  55 in total

1.  Tracking visual search over space and time.

Authors:  E S Olds; W B Cowan; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

2.  Attention protects the fidelity of visual memory: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The locus of spatial attention during the temporal integration of visual memories and visual percepts.

Authors:  James R Brockmole; David E Irwin; Ranxiao Frances Wang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

4.  Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: evidence against visual marking.

Authors:  Mieke Donk; Roel C Verburg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

5.  Age differences in enumerating things that move: implications for the development of multiple-object tracking.

Authors:  Lana M Trick; Diana Audet; Lynn Dales
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

Review 6.  Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues.

Authors:  Robert Rauschenberger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

7.  Goal-directed action is automatically biased towards looming motion.

Authors:  Jeff Moher; Jonathan Sit; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search.

Authors:  Mark J Fenske; Jane E Raymond; Melina A Kunar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

9.  Prioritization by transients in visual search.

Authors:  Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

10.  Major issues in the study of visual search: Part 2 of "40 Years of Feature Integration: Special Issue in Memory of Anne Treisman".

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.