Literature DB >> 11911385

Visual marking: dissociating effects of new and old set size.

Yuhong Jiang1, Marvin M Chun, Lawrence E Marks.   

Abstract

Visual marking makes it possible to ignore old items during search. In a typical study, old items are previewed 1 s before adding an equal number of new items, one of which is the target. Previewing half of the items reduces the search slope relating response time (RT) to overall set size by half. However, this manipulation sometimes only reduces overall RT but not search slope (Experiment 1). By orthogonally varying the numbers of old and new items, Experiment 2 shows that old and new set sizes interactively affect visual marking. Given a constant new set size, the size of the old set has negligible effect on RT. However, increasing the new set size reduces the preview benefit in overall RT. Experiment 3 shows that this reduction may be restricted to paradigms that use temporal segregation cues. Studies should vary old and new set size orthogonally to avoid missing a visual marking effect where one may be present.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11911385     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.28.2.293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  7 in total

1.  Age differences in enumerating things that move: implications for the development of multiple-object tracking.

Authors:  Lana M Trick; Diana Audet; Lynn Dales
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

2.  The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search.

Authors:  Mark J Fenske; Jane E Raymond; Melina A Kunar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

3.  Visual marking and change detection.

Authors:  Jose L Herrero; Ros Crawley; Cees van Leeuwen; Antonino Raffone
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2007-08-18

4.  Templates for rejection: configuring attention to ignore task-irrelevant features.

Authors:  Jason T Arita; Nancy B Carlisle; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Perceptual grouping constrains inhibition in time-based visual selection.

Authors:  Zorana Zupan; Derrick G Watson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Subset selective search on the basis of color and preview.

Authors:  Mieke Donk
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.199

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.