Literature DB >> 28871460

Opposing effects of memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention on distractor perception.

Suk Won Han1.   

Abstract

It is well known that a match between working memory contents and a visual stimulus creates attentional bias toward the memory-matching stimulus. The present study investigated whether this memory-driven attentional bias exerts similar effects with conventional, spatial attention driven by a cue stimulus. Specifically, we examined how the effect of a distracting, task-irrelevant stimulus is modulated when attention was oriented toward the distractor in memory- and stimulus-driven manners. The results showed that significant interference by a distractor decreased when attention was allocated to the distractor in a memory-driven manner, whereas the distracter captured attention in a stimulus-driven manner exerted increased interference. By contrast, memory-driven attention brought an unattended stimulus into attentional focus, while stimulus-driven attention failed to do so. These results provide evidence that the mechanisms underlying working memory-driven and stimulus-driven attention are separable, pointing to the dynamic and flexible relationship between working memory and attention.

Keywords:  Attention; Distractor interference; Memory-driven attention; Stimulus-driven attention; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28871460     DOI: 10.1007/s10339-017-0834-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Process        ISSN: 1612-4782


  32 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Contextual knowledge configures attentional control networks.

Authors:  Nicholas E DiQuattro; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-06-23

5.  Working memory enhances visual perception: evidence from signal detection analysis.

Authors:  David Soto; Alice Wriglesworth; Alex Bahrami-Balani; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.

Authors:  Monika Kiss; Anna Grubert; Anders Petersen; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Role of attentional tags in working memory-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Chun-Yu Kuo; Hsuan-Fu Chao
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.

Authors:  R Desimone; J Duncan
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Functional connectivity between ventral and dorsal frontoparietal networks underlies stimulus-driven and working memory-driven sources of visual distraction.

Authors:  Ciara M Greene; David Soto
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  1 in total

1.  Opposing effects of stimulus-driven and memory-driven attention in visual search.

Authors:  Koeun Jung; Suk Won Han; Yoonki Min
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.