Literature DB >> 22345720

Faculty and student perceptions of effective study strategies and materials.

Katie J Suda1, Gillian C Bell, Andrea S Franks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate faculty members' and students' perceptions of study strategies and materials.
METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with course directors and first- and second-year students to generate ideas relating to use of course materials, technology, class attendance, and study strategies for mastering class concepts.
RESULTS: Students and faculty members differed in their opinions about the utility of textbooks and supplemental resources. The main learning method recommended by students and faculty members was repeated review of course material. Students recommended viewing classroom lectures again online, if possible. Course directors reported believing that class attendance is important, but students based their opinions regarding the importance of attendance on their perceptions of lecture and handout quality. Results did not differ by campus or by student group (first-year vs. second-year students).
CONCLUSIONS: Students and faculty members have differing opinions on the process that could influence learning and course design. Faculty members should understand the strategies students are using to learn course material and consider additional or alternative course design and delivery techniques based on student feedback.

Keywords:  course design; focus group; learning; technology

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22345720      PMCID: PMC3279044          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7510201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  10 in total

1.  Student use and perceptions of different learning aids in a problem-based learning (PBL) dentistry course.

Authors:  Tania M Gerzina; Rebecca Worthington; Scott Byrne; Catherine McMahon
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.264

2.  Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in undergraduate and graduate entry programs.

Authors:  Lorraine Smith; Ines Krass; Erica Sainsbury; Grenville Rose
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in an Australian university.

Authors:  Lorraine Smith; Bandana Saini; Ines Krass; Timothy Chen; Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich; Erica Sainsbury
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  A primer on audience response systems: current applications and future considerations.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Evan Robinson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Use of an audience response system (ARS) in a dual-campus classroom environment.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Patrick J Medina; Donald S Wanzer; Jane E Wilson; Nelson Er; Mark L Britton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Esther P Black; Jürgen Rohr
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Student pharmacists' perceptions of testing and study strategies.

Authors:  Nicholas E Hagemeier; Holly L Mason
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 8.  Roles of innovation in education delivery.

Authors:  Robert A Blouin; William H Riffee; Evan T Robinson; Diane E Beck; Charles Green; Pamela U Joyner; Adam M Persky; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Correlation of Web usage and exam performance in a human anatomy and development course.

Authors:  Lawrence J Rizzolo; Marcus Aden; William B Stewart
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.414

10.  Influence of learning style on instructional multimedia effects on graduate student cognitive and psychomotor performance.

Authors:  A Russell Smith; Catherine Cavanaugh; Joyce Jones; John Venn; William Wilson
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2006
  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  A roadmap for educational research in pharmacy.

Authors:  Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Meredith J Dean; Russell J Mumper; Robert A Blouin; Mary T Roth
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Using grey literature to prepare pharmacy students for an evolving healthcare delivery system.

Authors:  Laura E Happe; Desiree' Walker
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 3.  [Surgical frontal lecture. Still important for teaching students?].

Authors:  A Wierlemann; J Baur; C T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Not all hard work leads to learning.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Elizabeth L Alford; Juliana Kyle
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Considerations for Determining Perceived Benefits and Challenges of Student Organizations at Pharmacy School Satellite Campuses.

Authors:  Gina T Ayers
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Online Self-testing Resources Prepared by Peer Tutors as a Formative Assessment Tool in Pharmacology Courses.

Authors:  Melinda E Lull; Jennifer L Mathews
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Student and faculty member perspectives on lecture capture in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Jon-Paul Marchand; Marion L Pearson; Simon P Albon
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 8.  Measuring Metacognitive Knowledge, Monitoring, and Control in the Pharmacy Classroom and Experiential Settings.

Authors:  Michelle L Rivers; John Dunlosky; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.047

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.