Literature DB >> 18483604

Use of an audience response system (ARS) in a dual-campus classroom environment.

Melissa S Medina1, Patrick J Medina, Donald S Wanzer, Jane E Wilson, Nelson Er, Mark L Britton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To implement an audience response system in a dual-campus classroom that aggregated data during graded (attendance and quizzes) and non-graded classroom activities (formative quizzes, case discussions, examination reviews, and team activities) and explore its strengths, weaknesses, and impact on active learning.
DESIGN: After extensive research, an appropriate audience response system was selected and implemented in a dual-classroom setting for a third-year required PharmD course. Students were assigned a clicker and training and policies regarding clicker use were reviewed. Activities involving clicker use were carefully planned to simultaneously engage students in both classrooms in real time. Focus groups were conducted with students to gather outcomes data. ASSESSMENT: Students and faculty members felt that the immediate feedback the automated response system (ARS) provided was most beneficial during non-graded activities. Student anxiety increased with use of ARS during graded activities due to fears regarding technology failure, user error, and academic integrity.
SUMMARY: ARS is a viable tool for increasing active learning in a doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) program, especially when used for non-graded class activities. Faculty members should proceed cautiously with using ARS for graded classroom activities and develop detailed and documented policies for ARS use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18483604      PMCID: PMC2384213          DOI: 10.5688/aj720238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  2 in total

1.  Audience response made easy: using personal digital assistants as a classroom polling tool.

Authors:  Anil S Menon; Shannon Moffett; Melissa Enriquez; Miriam M Martinez; Parvati Dev; Todd Grappone
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  A novel standard-compliant audience response system for medical education.

Authors:  Jonathan L Streeter; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

  2 in total
  17 in total

1.  Faculty and student perceptions of effective study strategies and materials.

Authors:  Katie J Suda; Gillian C Bell; Andrea S Franks
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Concurrent use of an audience response system at a multi-campus college of pharmacy.

Authors:  Kevin A Clauson; Fadi M Alkhateeb; Devada Singh-Franco
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  An Empirical Study of Neural Network-Based Audience Response Technology in a Human Anatomy Course for Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  José Luis Fernández-Alemán; Laura López-González; Ofelia González-Sequeros; Chrisina Jayne; Juan José López-Jiménez; Juan Manuel Carrillo-de-Gea; Ambrosio Toval
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Perceptions of pharmacy students, faculty members, and administrators on the use of technology in the classroom.

Authors:  Margarita V DiVall; Mary S Hayney; Wallace Marsh; Michael W Neville; Stephen O'Barr; Erin D Sheets; Larry D Calhoun
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 5.  Best practices for implementing team-based learning in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Michelle Z Farland; Brigitte L Sicat; Andrea S Franks; Karen S Pater; Melissa S Medina; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Esther P Black; Jürgen Rohr
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Impact of a student response system on short- and long-term learning in a drug literature evaluation course.

Authors:  Flora C Liu; Jacob P Gettig; Nancy Fjortoft
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Observations using text messaging as an interactive tool.

Authors:  Eric Wombwell
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Active-learning processes used in US pharmacy education.

Authors:  David W Stewart; Stacy D Brown; Cheri W Clavier; Jarrett Wyatt
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Audience response technology: engaging and empowering non-medical prescribing students in pharmacology learning.

Authors:  Joanne S Lymn; Alison Mostyn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.