Literature DB >> 19002277

A primer on audience response systems: current applications and future considerations.

Jeff Cain1, Evan Robinson.   

Abstract

Audience response systems (ARSs) are an increasingly popular tool in higher education for promoting interactivity, gathering feedback, preassessing knowledge, and assessing students' understanding of lecture concepts. Instructors in numerous disciplines are realizing the pedagogical value of these systems. Actual research on ARS usage within pharmacy education is sparse. In this paper, the health professions literature on uses of ARSs is reviewed and a primer on the issues, benefits, and potential uses within pharmacy education is presented. Future areas of educational research on ARS instructional strategies are also suggested.

Entities:  

Keywords:  audience response system; technology; technology-enhanced learning

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19002277      PMCID: PMC2576416          DOI: 10.5688/aj720477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  9 in total

1.  Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures.

Authors:  Matti Uhari; Marjo Renko; Hannu Soini
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 2.  Interactive learning in medicine: socrates in electronic clothes.

Authors:  M Brezis; R Cohen
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2004-01

3.  Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents.

Authors:  T Eric Schackow; Milton Chavez; Lauren Loya; Michael Friedman
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Creating learner-centered classrooms: use of an audience response system in pediatric dentistry education.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Johnson
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: an application to resident education.

Authors:  Archana Pradhan; Dina Sparano; Cande V Ananth
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Teaching more by lecturing less.

Authors:  Jennifer K Knight; William B Wood
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

Review 7.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.

Authors:  Jane E Caldwell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses.

Authors:  Ralph W Preszler; Angus Dawe; Charles B Shuster; Michèle Shuster
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals.

Authors:  Redonda G Miller; Bimal H Ashar; Kelly J Getz
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.355

  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  Faculty and student perceptions of effective study strategies and materials.

Authors:  Katie J Suda; Gillian C Bell; Andrea S Franks
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Concurrent use of an audience response system at a multi-campus college of pharmacy.

Authors:  Kevin A Clauson; Fadi M Alkhateeb; Devada Singh-Franco
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Evaluation of interactive teaching for undergraduate medical students using a classroom interactive response system in India.

Authors:  Rakesh Datta; Karuna Datta; M D Venkatesh
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-06-19

4.  An Empirical Study of Neural Network-Based Audience Response Technology in a Human Anatomy Course for Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  José Luis Fernández-Alemán; Laura López-González; Ofelia González-Sequeros; Chrisina Jayne; Juan José López-Jiménez; Juan Manuel Carrillo-de-Gea; Ambrosio Toval
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Esther P Black; Jürgen Rohr
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Impact of a student response system on short- and long-term learning in a drug literature evaluation course.

Authors:  Flora C Liu; Jacob P Gettig; Nancy Fjortoft
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Educational technology use among US colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Authors:  Michael S Monaghan; Jeff J Cain; Patrick M Malone; Tracy A Chapman; Ryan W Walters; David C Thompson; Steven T Riedl
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 8.  Educational Scholarship and Technology: Resources for a Changing Undergraduate Medical Education Curriculum.

Authors:  Brandon N Kyle; Irma Corral; Nadyah Janine John; P G Shelton
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2017-06

9.  Creation of medicinal chemistry learning communities through enhanced technology and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Authors:  Brian Henriksen; Victoria Roche
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  A Five-Year Evaluation of Examination Structure in a Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Course.

Authors:  Anne Schullo-Feulner; Claire Kolar; Kristin K Janke
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.