Literature DB >> 19513159

An audience response system strategy to improve student motivation, attention, and feedback.

Jeff Cain1, Esther P Black, Jürgen Rohr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To implement an audience response system (ARS) to improve student motivation and attention during lectures and provide immediate feedback to the instructor concerning student understanding of lecture content in a Physiological Chemistry/Molecular Biology course.
DESIGN: Students used ARS devices to respond to strategically placed questions throughout physiological chemistry/molecular biology lectures. The instructor inserted 6 to 7 questions that promoted student/class interactivity into each of several 50-minute lectures to focus students' attention and provide feedback on students' comprehension of material. ASSESSMENT: Ninety-eight percent of first-year pharmacy (P1) students (n = 109) reported that strategically placed ARS questions throughout lectures helped them maintain attention. Reports from an independent focus group indicated that students favored this strategy. Furthermore, ARS feedback helped the instructor gauge student comprehension and adjust lectures accordingly.
CONCLUSIONS: Focused, strategically placed ARS questions throughout lectures may help students maintain attention and stay motivated to learn. Feedback from these questions also allows instructors to adapt lectures to address areas of deficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active learning; audience response system; physiological chemistry course; technology

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19513159      PMCID: PMC2690899          DOI: 10.5688/aj730221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  10 in total

1.  Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures.

Authors:  Matti Uhari; Marjo Renko; Hannu Soini
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents.

Authors:  T Eric Schackow; Milton Chavez; Lauren Loya; Michael Friedman
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Creating learner-centered classrooms: use of an audience response system in pediatric dentistry education.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Johnson
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  The influence of an audience response system on knowledge retention: an application to resident education.

Authors:  Archana Pradhan; Dina Sparano; Cande V Ananth
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.

Authors:  Jane E Caldwell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Professional students' perceptions of the value, role, and impact of science in clinical education.

Authors:  Z Austin; P A M Gregory
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  A primer on audience response systems: current applications and future considerations.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Evan Robinson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Use of an audience response system (ARS) in a dual-campus classroom environment.

Authors:  Melissa S Medina; Patrick J Medina; Donald S Wanzer; Jane E Wilson; Nelson Er; Mark L Britton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  A seminar course on contemporary pharmacy issues.

Authors:  Therese I Poirier
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Evaluation of an audience response system for the continuing education of health professionals.

Authors:  Redonda G Miller; Bimal H Ashar; Kelly J Getz
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.355

  10 in total
  23 in total

1.  Faculty and student perceptions of effective study strategies and materials.

Authors:  Katie J Suda; Gillian C Bell; Andrea S Franks
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Concurrent use of an audience response system at a multi-campus college of pharmacy.

Authors:  Kevin A Clauson; Fadi M Alkhateeb; Devada Singh-Franco
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  An Empirical Study of Neural Network-Based Audience Response Technology in a Human Anatomy Course for Pharmacy Students.

Authors:  José Luis Fernández-Alemán; Laura López-González; Ofelia González-Sequeros; Chrisina Jayne; Juan José López-Jiménez; Juan Manuel Carrillo-de-Gea; Ambrosio Toval
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom.

Authors:  Jacqueline E McLaughlin; LaToya M Griffin; Denise A Esserman; Christopher A Davidson; Dylan M Glatt; Mary T Roth; Nastaran Gharkholonarehe; Russell J Mumper
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Impact of a student response system on short- and long-term learning in a drug literature evaluation course.

Authors:  Flora C Liu; Jacob P Gettig; Nancy Fjortoft
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Observations using text messaging as an interactive tool.

Authors:  Eric Wombwell
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Medical school hotline: harnessing technology for a 21st century medical education.

Authors:  Joseph W Turban
Journal:  Hawaii Med J       Date:  2011-04

8.  Creation of medicinal chemistry learning communities through enhanced technology and interdisciplinary collaboration.

Authors:  Brian Henriksen; Victoria Roche
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  A Five-Year Evaluation of Examination Structure in a Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Course.

Authors:  Anne Schullo-Feulner; Claire Kolar; Kristin K Janke
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  Teaching the pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs.

Authors:  Martin M Zdanowicz; Launa M J Lynch
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.