Literature DB >> 21519424

Student pharmacists' perceptions of testing and study strategies.

Nicholas E Hagemeier1, Holly L Mason.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To solicit student pharmacists' perceptions of testing, study strategies, and recall ability, and use of retrieval practices in metacognitive learning strategies.
METHODS: A 42-item survey instrument was constructed that covered the following areas of interest: perceptions of the purpose of testing, perceptions of study strategies, perceptions of recall ability, use of retrieval practice, and demographic characteristics. The survey instrument was administered to first-, second-, and third-year doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) students (N = 425) at Purdue University.
RESULTS: Students perceived the primary purpose of tests to be to assess the amount of material they had learned. Massed practice was a technique that they frequently used in studying for course examinations. Students did not express confidence in their ability to recall learned information once they became pharmacists. The use of retrieval practice in learning was not used by most student pharmacists, nor did students perceive retrieval practice to increase retention or learning.
CONCLUSION: Perceptions of testing and the manner in which student pharmacists engage in learning activities may not be optimal for the development of lifelong learners.

Entities:  

Keywords:  metacognition; retrieval practice; student perceptions; study strategies; testing

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21519424      PMCID: PMC3073110          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe75235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  11 in total

1.  Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in undergraduate and graduate entry programs.

Authors:  Lorraine Smith; Ines Krass; Erica Sainsbury; Grenville Rose
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-03

3.  Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karpicke; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  The critical importance of retrieval for learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karpicke; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The promise and perils of self-regulated study.

Authors:  Nate Kornell; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

6.  Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in an Australian university.

Authors:  Lorraine Smith; Bandana Saini; Ines Krass; Timothy Chen; Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich; Erica Sainsbury
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own?

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karpicke; Andrew C Butler; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2009-05

8.  Correcting a metacognitive error: feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.

Authors:  Andrew C Butler; Jeffrey D Karpicke; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-11

10.  The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.

Authors:  Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09
View more
  9 in total

1.  Faculty and student perceptions of effective study strategies and materials.

Authors:  Katie J Suda; Gillian C Bell; Andrea S Franks
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Not all hard work leads to learning.

Authors:  Adam M Persky; Elizabeth L Alford; Juliana Kyle
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  A Subgroup Analysis of the Impact of Self-testing Frequency on Examination Scores in a Pathophysiology Course.

Authors:  Peter C Panus; David W Stewart; Nicholas E Hagemeier; Jim C Thigpen; Lauren Brooks
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Pharmacy education instruction: Preference and practices, Saudi students' perception.

Authors:  Mirghani A Yousif; Ahmed S Eldalo; Mustafa A Abd Allah; Mohammed A Al-Sawat; Haitham M Al-Wahaibi; Abd Allah S Al-Osaimi; Salman H Al-Gethami
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Pharmacy student self-testing as a predictor of examination performance.

Authors:  David Stewart; Peter Panus; Nicholas Hagemeier; Jim Thigpen; Lauren Brooks
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Impact of Flipped Classroom Design on Student Performance and Perceptions in a Pharmacotherapy Course.

Authors:  Cathy L Koo; Elaine L Demps; Charlotte Farris; John D Bowman; Ladan Panahi; Paul Boyle
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Test-Enhanced Learning in an Immunology and Infectious Disease Medicinal Chemistry/Pharmacology Course.

Authors:  Marcy Hernick
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  The Effect of Reflective Activities on Reflective Thinking Ability in an Undergraduate Pharmacy Curriculum.

Authors:  Cherie Tsingos-Lucas; Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich; Carl R Schneider; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 9.  Measuring Metacognitive Knowledge, Monitoring, and Control in the Pharmacy Classroom and Experiential Settings.

Authors:  Michelle L Rivers; John Dunlosky; Adam M Persky
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.047

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.