Literature DB >> 22245714

Characteristics of detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels as a function of pulse rate in human cochlear implant users.

Ning Zhou1, Li Xu, Bryan E Pfingst.   

Abstract

The ability of an implanted ear to integrate multiple pulses, as measured by the slopes of detection threshold level (T level) versus pulse rate functions, may reflect cochlear health in the cochlea, as suggested by previous animal studies (Kang et al., 2010; Pfingst et al., 2011). In the current study, we examined the slopes of T level versus pulse rate functions in human subjects with cochlear implants. Typically, T levels decrease as a function of pulse rate, consistent with a multipulse integration mechanism. The magnitudes of the slopes of the T level versus pulse rate functions obtained from the human subjects were comparable to those reported in the animal studies. The slopes varied across stimulation sites, but did not change systematically along the tonotopic axis. This suggests that the slopes are dependent on local conditions near the individual stimulation sites. The characteristics of these functions were also similar to those found in animals in that the slopes for higher pulse rates were steeper than those for the lower pulse rates, consistent with a combined effect of multipulse integration and cumulative partial depolarization mechanisms at rates above 1000 pps. The maximum comfortable loudness level (C level) versus pulse rate functions were also examined to determine the effect of level on the slopes. Slopes of C-level functions were shallower than those for the T-level functions and were not correlated with those of the T-level functions, so the mechanisms underlying these two functions are probably not identical. The slopes of the T- or C-level functions were not dependent on stimulus-current level. Based on these results, we suggest that slopes of T level versus pulse rate functions might be a useful measure for estimating nerve survival in the cochlea in regions close to the stimulation sites.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22245714      PMCID: PMC3335269          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  38 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Comparison of electrode position in the human cochlea using various perimodiolar electrode arrays.

Authors:  M Tykocinski; L T Cohen; B C Pyman; T Roland; C Treaba; J Palamara; M C Dahm; R K Shepherd; J Xu; R S Cowan; N L Cohen; G M Clark
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-03

3.  Effects of phase duration and electrode separation on loudness growth in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  M Chatterjee; Q J Fu; R V Shannon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant recipients' thresholds and maximum acceptable loudness levels.

Authors:  M W Skinner; L K Holden; T A Holden; M E Demorest
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Loudness summation for pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea: effects of rate, electrode separation, level, and mode of stimulation.

Authors:  C M McKay; M D Remine; H J McDermott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding.

Authors:  P C Loizou; O Poroy; M Dorman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Margaret W Skinner; Timothy A Holden; Marilyn E Demorest
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Detection of pulse trains in the electrically stimulated cochlea: effects of cochlear health.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Deborah J Colesa; Sheena Hembrador; Stephen Y Kang; John C Middlebrooks; Yehoash Raphael; Gina L Su
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance.

Authors:  Elaine Saunders; Lawrence Cohen; Antje Aschendorff; William Shapiro; Michelle Knight; Mathias Stecker; Benhard Richter; Susan Waltzman; Michael Tykocinski; Tom Roland; Roland Laszig; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Darlene R Ketten; Laura K Holden; Gary W Harding; Peter G Smith; George A Gates; J Gail Neely; G Robert Kletzker; Barry Brunsden; Barbara Blocker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-02-27
View more
  20 in total

1.  Psychophysically based site selection coupled with dichotic stimulation improves speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 3.  Importance of cochlear health for implant function.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Ning Zhou; Deborah J Colesa; Melissa M Watts; Stefan B Strahl; Soha N Garadat; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Cameron L Budenz; Yehoash Raphael; Teresa A Zwolan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to spatial selectivity.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Integration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Casey T Kraft; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-20

6.  Effect of Pulse Rate on Loudness Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Mahan Azadpour; Colette M McKay; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-03-12

7.  Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear Implant Users: Effects of Stimulation Mode.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Mingqi Hang
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-30

8.  Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Timothy A Holden; Teresa A Zwolan; H Alexander Arts; Jill B Firszt; Christopher J Buswinka; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-04-27

9.  The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Jacquelyn L Baudhuin; Jenny L Goehring
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.