Literature DB >> 32342256

Effects of Electrode Location on Estimates of Neural Health in Humans with Cochlear Implants.

Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac1,2,3, Timothy A Holden4, Teresa A Zwolan5, H Alexander Arts5, Jill B Firszt4, Christopher J Buswinka6, Bryan E Pfingst6.   

Abstract

There are a number of psychophysical and electrophysiological measures that are correlated with SGN density in animal models, and these same measures can be performed in humans with cochlear implants (CIs). Thus, these measures are potentially applicable in humans for estimating the condition of the neural population (so called "neural health" or "cochlear health") at individual sites along the electrode array and possibly adjusting the stimulation strategy in the CI sound processor accordingly. Some measures used to estimate neural health in animals have included the electrically evoked compound potential (ECAP), psychophysical detection thresholds, and multipulse integration (MPI). With regard to ECAP measures, it has been shown that the change in the ECAP response as a function of increasing the stimulus interphase gap ("IPG Effect") also reflects neural density in implanted animals. These animal studies have typically been conducted using preparations in which the electrode was in a fixed position with respect to the neural population, whereas in human cochlear implant users, the position of individual electrodes varies widely within an electrode array and also across subjects. The current study evaluated the effects of electrode location in the implanted cochlea (specifically medial-lateral location) on various electrophysiological and psychophysical measures in eleven human subjects. The results demonstrated that some measures of interest, specifically ECAP thresholds, psychophysical detection thresholds, and ECAP amplitude-growth function (AGF) linear slope, were significantly related to the distances between the electrode and mid-modiolar axis (MMA). These same measures were less strongly related or not significantly related to the electrode to medial wall (MW) distance. In contrast, neither the IPG Effect for the ECAP AGF slope or threshold, nor the MPI slopes were significantly related to MMA or MW distance from the electrodes. These results suggest that "within-channel" estimates of neural health such as the IPG Effect and MPI slope might be more suitable for estimating nerve condition in humans for clinical application since they appear to be relatively independent of electrode position.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implant; electrode placement; neural health

Year:  2020        PMID: 32342256      PMCID: PMC7392989          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-020-00749-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  48 in total

1.  The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system.

Authors:  F Rattay
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Integration of Pulse Trains in Humans and Guinea Pigs with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Casey T Kraft; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-20

3.  Degeneration pattern of human first-order cochlear neurons.

Authors:  Heidi Felix; Anita Pollak; Michael Gleeson; Lars-Göran Johnsson
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2002

4.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; E Javel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation.

Authors:  R K Shepherd; S Hatsushika; G M Clark
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  R D Hall
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Relationship between multipulse integration and speech recognition with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Timothy A Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Arne H Voie; Barry Brunsden; J Gail Neely; Eugene A Saxon; Timothy E Hullar; Charles C Finley
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2007-04

9.  Predicting auditory nerve survival using the compound action potential.

Authors:  Brian R Earl; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic.

Authors:  Shuman He; Holly F B Teagle; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  15 in total

1.  How electrically evoked compound action potentials in chronically implanted guinea pigs relate to auditory nerve health and electrode impedance.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Deborah J Colesa; Christopher J Buswinka; Andrew M Rabah; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Relationships between Intrascalar Tissue, Neuron Survival, and Cochlear Implant Function.

Authors:  Donald L Swiderski; Deborah J Colesa; Aaron P Hughes; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-20

3.  Cochlear implants and other inner ear prostheses: today and tomorrow.

Authors:  Lina Aj Reiss
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-08-14

4.  Estimating health of the implanted cochlea using psychophysical strength-duration functions and electrode configuration.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Changes in the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential over time After Implantation and Subsequent Deafening in Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Heval Benav; Sjaak F L Klis; Huib Versnel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-10

6.  The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Brittney L Carter; William J Riggs; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Using the electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap effect to select electrode stimulation sites in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.672

8.  Sensitivity to Pulse Phase Duration as a Marker of Neural Health Across Cochlear Implant Recipients and Electrodes.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Zhen Zhu; Lixue Dong; John Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-08

9.  A Broadly Applicable Method for Characterizing the Slope of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Amplitude Growth Function.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Dyan Ramekers; Deborah J Colesa; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Evaluating and Comparing Behavioural and Electrophysiological Estimates of Neural Health in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Tim Brochier; François Guérit; John M Deeks; Charlotte Garcia; Manohar Bance; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.