Literature DB >> 29532190

Effect of Pulse Rate on Loudness Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.

Mahan Azadpour1, Colette M McKay2,3, Mario A Svirsky4.   

Abstract

Stimulation pulse rate affects current amplitude discrimination by cochlear implant (CI) users, indicated by the evidence that the JND (just noticeable difference) in current amplitude delivered by a CI electrode becomes larger at higher pulse rates. However, it is not clearly understood whether pulse rate would affect discrimination of speech intensities presented acoustically to CI processors, or what the size of this effect might be. Intensity discrimination depends on two factors: the growth of loudness with increasing sound intensity and the loudness JND (or the just noticeable loudness increment). This study evaluated the hypothesis that stimulation pulse rate affects loudness JND. This was done by measuring current amplitude JNDs in an experiment design based on signal detection theory according to which loudness discrimination is related to internal noise (which is manifested by variability in loudness percept in response to repetitions of the same physical stimulus). Current amplitude JNDs were measured for equally loud pulse trains of 500 and 3000 pps (pulses per second) by increasing the current amplitude of the target pulse train until it was perceived just louder than a same-rate or different-rate reference pulse train. The JND measures were obtained at two presentation levels. At the louder level, the current amplitude JNDs were affected by the rate of the reference pulse train in a way that was consistent with greater noise or variability in loudness perception for the higher pulse rate. The results suggest that increasing pulse rate from 500 to 3000 pps can increase loudness JND by 60 % at the upper portion of the dynamic range. This is equivalent to a 38 % reduction in the number of discriminable steps for acoustic and speech intensities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implant; loudness discrimination; loudness variability; stimulation pulse rate

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29532190      PMCID: PMC5962473          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-018-0658-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  29 in total

1.  Intensity discrimination and increment detection in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Gail S Donaldson; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A measure of internal noise based on sample discrimination.

Authors:  Walt Jesteadt; Lance Nizami; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of pulse rate on threshold and dynamic range in Clarion cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Gail S Donaldson; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The dependence of auditory nerve rate adaptation on electric stimulus parameters, electrode position, and fiber diameter: a computer model study.

Authors:  Jihwan Woo; Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12-22

5.  Characteristics of detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels as a function of pulse rate in human cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Li Xu; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Intensity discrimination: a severe departure from Weber's law.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Two procedures for estimating internal noise.

Authors:  M F Spiegel; D M Green
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Intensity discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  A C Schroder; N F Viemeister; D A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Noise in the nervous system.

Authors:  A Aldo Faisal; Luc P J Selen; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in cochlear implantees using a method that limits overall loudness cues.

Authors:  Matthew Fraser; Colette M McKay
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of Stimulation Rate on Speech Understanding in Older Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Maureen J Shader; Nicole Nguyen; Miranda Cleary; Ronna Hertzano; David J Eisenman; Samira Anderson; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Management of Severe Facial Nerve Cross Stimulation by Cochlear Implant Replacement to Change Pulse Shape and Grounding Configuration: A Case-series.

Authors:  Susan T Eitutis; Robert P Carlyon; Yu Chuen Tam; Marina Salorio-Corbetto; Zebunnisa Vanat; Karen Tebbutt; Rhian Bardsley; Harry R F Powell; Shibasis Chowdhury; James R Tysome; Manohar L Bance
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.311

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.