Literature DB >> 22228614

Amputee socks: how does sock ply relate to sock thickness?

Joan E Sanders1, John C Cagle, Daniel S Harrison, Ari Karchin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The term 'sock ply' may be a source of confusion in prosthetics practice because there may not be a consistent relationship between sock ply and sock thickness.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize how sock ply related to sock thickness for different sock materials commonly used in limb prosthetics. We also evaluated how sock thickness changed under loading conditions experienced while wearing a lower limb prosthesis compared with unstressed conditions. STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental. Mechanical assessment.
METHODS: Seven sock materials of varying ply and sheaths were tested using a custom instrument. Sock thickness under eight different compressive stress conditions and two different biaxial in-plane tensile strain conditions were measured.
RESULTS: For socks woven from a single material, thickness under walking stance phase conditions averaged 0.7, 1.2 and 1.5 mm for 1, 3 and 5-ply, respectively. For socks woven from several materials, the corresponding results were 0.4, 0.7 and 0.8 mm, respectively. Sock ply did not sum, e.g. a 3-ply sock was not three times the thickness of a 1-ply sock.
CONCLUSIONS: Sock thickness and compressive stiffness are strongly dependent upon sock material, interface pressure, and in-plane biaxial strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228614      PMCID: PMC4433011          DOI: 10.1177/0309364611431290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  6 in total

1.  Effects of changes in cadence, prosthetic componentry, and time on interface pressures and shear stresses of three trans-tibial amputees.

Authors:  J E Sanders; S G Zachariah; A B Baker; J M Greve; C Clinton
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Standing interface stresses as a predictor of walking interface stresses in the trans-tibial prosthesis.

Authors:  S G Zachariah; J E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 3.  Residual limb volume change: systematic review of measurement and management.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Stefania Fatone
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2011

4.  Indentor tests and finite element modeling of bulk muscular tissue in vivo.

Authors:  W M Vannah; D S Childress
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1996-07

5.  Interface pressures and shear stresses at thirteen socket sites on two persons with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  J E Sanders; D Lam; A J Dralle; R Okumura
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1997-01

6.  Volume fluctuations in the residual limbs of lower limb amputees.

Authors:  G R Fernie; P J Holliday
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.966

  6 in total
  13 in total

1.  Computer-socket manufacturing error: how much before it is clinically apparent?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Michael R Severance; Kathryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

2.  How does adding and removing liquid from socket bladders affect residual-limb fluid volume?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; John C Cagle; Daniel S Harrison; Timothy R Myers; Kathryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

3.  Development of Standardized Material Testing Protocols for Prosthetic Liners.

Authors:  John C Cagle; Per G Reinhall; Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  A finite element model to assess transtibial prosthetic sockets with elastomeric liners.

Authors:  John C Cagle; Per G Reinhall; Kate J Allyn; Jake McLean; Paul Hinrichs; Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Amputee socks: Sock thickness changes with normal use.

Authors:  John C Cagle; Krittika J D'Silva; Brian J Hafner; Daniel S Harrison; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Effects of socket size on metrics of socket fit in trans-tibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Robert T Youngblood; Brian J Hafner; John C Cagle; Jake B McLean; Christian B Redd; Colin R Dietrich; Marcia A Ciol; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Self-reported prosthetic sock use among persons with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Krittika D'Silva; Brian J Hafner; Katheryn J Allyn; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Modeling the mechanics of elevated vacuum systems in prosthetic sockets.

Authors:  Robert T Youngblood; Brian J Hafner; Joseph M Czerniecki; Jacob T Brzostowski; Katheryn J Allyn; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.242

9.  Technical note: Computer-manufactured inserts for prosthetic sockets.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Jake B McLean; John C Cagle; David W Gardner; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.242

10.  Amputee socks: thickness of multiple socks.

Authors:  John C Cagle; Alan J Yu; Marcia A Ciol; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 1.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.