Literature DB >> 22773260

Computer-socket manufacturing error: how much before it is clinically apparent?

Joan E Sanders1, Michael R Severance, Kathryn J Allyn.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to pursue quality standards for computer-manufacturing of prosthetic sockets for people with transtibial limb loss. Thirty-three duplicates of study participants' normally used sockets were fabricated using central fabrication facilities. Socket-manufacturing errors were compared with clinical assessments of socket fit. Of the 33 sockets tested, 23 were deemed clinically to need modification. All 13 sockets with mean radial error (MRE) greater than 0.25 mm were clinically unacceptable, and 11 of those were deemed in need of sizing reduction. Of the remaining 20 sockets, 5 sockets with interquartile range (IQR) greater than 0.40 mm were deemed globally or regionally oversized and in need of modification. Of the remaining 15 sockets, 5 sockets with closed contours of elevated surface normal angle error (SNAE) were deemed clinically to need shape modification at those closed contour locations. The remaining 10 sockets were deemed clinically acceptable and not in need modification. MRE, IQR, and SNAE may serve as effective metrics to characterize quality of computer-manufactured prosthetic sockets, helping facilitate the development of quality standards for the socket manufacturing industry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22773260      PMCID: PMC4432940          DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2011.05.0097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  10 in total

1.  Central fabrication: carved positive assessment.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Michael R Severance; Timothy R Myers; Marcia A Ciol
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Automated fabrication of mobility aids (AFMA): below-knee CASD/CAM testing and evaluation program results.

Authors:  V L Houston; E M Burgess; D S Childress; H R Lehneis; C P Mason; M A Garbarini; K P LaBlanc; D A Boone; R B Chan; J H Harlan
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1992

3.  An evaluation of computer aided design of below-knee prosthetic sockets.

Authors:  A K Topper; G R Fernie
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Development of an integrated CAD-FEA process for below-knee prosthetic sockets.

Authors:  J C H Goh; P V S Lee; S L Toh; C K Ooi
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-03-24       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Using computational simulation to aid in the prediction of socket fit: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Winson C C Lee; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  CAD/CAM transtibial prosthetic sockets from central fabrication facilities: how accurate are they?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Ellen L Rogers; Elizabeth A Sorenson; Gregory S Lee; Daniel C Abrahamson
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2007

7.  Comparison of CAD-CAM and hand made sockets for PTB prostheses.

Authors:  P Köhler; L Lindh; P Netz
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Amputee socks: how does sock ply relate to sock thickness?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; John C Cagle; Daniel S Harrison; Ari Karchin
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Real-time patient-specific finite element analysis of internal stresses in the soft tissues of a residual limb: a new tool for prosthetic fitting.

Authors:  S Portnoy; G Yarnitzky; Z Yizhar; A Kristal; U Oppenheim; I Siev-Ner; A Gefen
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  CAD CAM trans-tibial temporary prosthesis: analysis and comparison with an established technique.

Authors:  G K Ruder
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.895

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  How does adding and removing liquid from socket bladders affect residual-limb fluid volume?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; John C Cagle; Daniel S Harrison; Timothy R Myers; Kathryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

2.  Effects of socket size on metrics of socket fit in trans-tibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Robert T Youngblood; Brian J Hafner; John C Cagle; Jake B McLean; Christian B Redd; Colin R Dietrich; Marcia A Ciol; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  A Bioimpedance Analysis Platform for Amputee Residual Limb Assessment.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Mark A Moehring; Travis M Rothlisberger; Reid H Phillips; Tyler Hartley; Colin R Dietrich; Christian B Redd; David W Gardner; John C Cagle
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Influence of prior activity on residual limb volume and shape measured using plaster casting: results from individuals with transtibial limb loss.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Michael R Severance; David L Swartzendruber; Katheryn J Allyn; Marcia A Ciol
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2013

5.  Technical note: Computer-manufactured inserts for prosthetic sockets.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Jake B McLean; John C Cagle; David W Gardner; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Jacob T Brzostowski; Brian G Larsen; Robert T Youngblood; Marcia A Ciol; Brian J Hafner; Clement J Gurrey; Jake B McLean; Katheryn J Allyn; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Volume Fluctuations in Active and Nonactive Transtibial Prosthetics Users.

Authors:  Nur Afiqah Hamzah; Nasrul Anuar Abd Razak; Mohd Sayuti Ab Karim; Siti Zuliana Salleh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.246

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.