Literature DB >> 24203546

How does adding and removing liquid from socket bladders affect residual-limb fluid volume?

Joan E Sanders1, John C Cagle, Daniel S Harrison, Timothy R Myers, Kathryn J Allyn.   

Abstract

Adding and removing liquid from socket bladders is a means for people with limb loss to accommodate residual-limb volume change. We fit 19 people with transtibial amputation using their regular prosthetic socket with fluid bladders on the inside socket surface to undergo cycles of bladder liquid addition and removal. In each cycle, subjects sat, stood, and walked for 90 s with bladder liquid added, and then sat, stood, and walked for 90 s again with the bladder liquid removed. The amount of bladder liquid added was increased in each cycle. We used bioimpedance analysis to measure residual-limb fluid volume. Results showed that the preferred bladder liquid volume was 16.8 +/- 8.4 mL (mean +/- standard deviation), corresponding with 1.7% +/- 0.8% of the average socket volume between the bioimpedance voltage-sensing electrodes. Residual-limb fluid volume driven out of the residual limb when bladder liquid was added was typically not recovered upon subsequent bladder liquid removal. Of the 19 subjects, 15 experienced a gradual residual-limb fluid volume loss over the test session. Care should be taken when implementing adjustable socket technologies in people with limb loss. Reducing socket volume may accentuate residual-limb fluid volume loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24203546      PMCID: PMC4431595          DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.06.0121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  26 in total

Review 1.  Investigation of chronic venous insufficiency: A consensus statement (France, March 5-9, 1997).

Authors:  A N Nicolaides
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Mechanical performance of inflatable inserts used in limb prosthetics.

Authors:  J E Sanders; D V Cassisi
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

3.  Bioelectrical impedance measures in different position and vs dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  A Andreoli; G Melchiorri; A De Lorenzo; I Caruso; P Sinibaldi Salimei; M Guerrisi
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Bioimpedance analysis: a useful technique for assessing appendicular lean soft tissue mass and distribution.

Authors:  Serenella Salinari; Alessandro Bertuzzi; Geltrude Mingrone; Esmeralda Capristo; Antonino Scarfone; Aldo V Greco; Steven B Heymsfield
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-04

5.  Reliability and variability of bioimpedance measures in normal adults: effects of age, gender, and body mass.

Authors:  Manuela Dittmar
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  How do sock ply changes affect residual-limb fluid volume in people with transtibial amputation?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Daniel S Harrison; Katheryn J Allyn; Timothy R Myers; Marcia A Ciol; Elaine C Tsai
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

7.  Computer-socket manufacturing error: how much before it is clinically apparent?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Michael R Severance; Kathryn J Allyn
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012

8.  Preserving central blood volume: changes in body fluid compartments during hemodialysis.

Authors:  T Shulman; A P Heidenheim; C Kianfar; S M Shulman; R M Lindsay
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.872

9.  Amputee socks: how does sock ply relate to sock thickness?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; John C Cagle; Daniel S Harrison; Ari Karchin
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Preliminary investigation of residual-limb fluid volume changes within one day.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Katheryn J Allyn; Daniel S Harrison; Timothy R Myers; Marcia A Ciol; Elaine C Tsai
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2012
View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of socket size on metrics of socket fit in trans-tibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Robert T Youngblood; Brian J Hafner; John C Cagle; Jake B McLean; Christian B Redd; Colin R Dietrich; Marcia A Ciol; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  Does temporary socket removal affect residual limb fluid volume of trans-tibial amputees?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Tyler L Hartley; Reid H Phillips; Marcia A Ciol; Brian J Hafner; Katheryn J Allyn; Dan S Harrison
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Jacob T Brzostowski; Brian G Larsen; Robert T Youngblood; Marcia A Ciol; Brian J Hafner; Clement J Gurrey; Jake B McLean; Katheryn J Allyn; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Effectiveness of elevated vacuum and suction prosthetic suspension systems in managing daily residual limb fluid volume change in people with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Robert T Youngblood; Jacob T Brzostowski; Brian J Hafner; Joseph M Czerniecki; Katheryn J Allyn; Richard L Foster; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 1.895

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.