Literature DB >> 25733408

Amputee socks: Sock thickness changes with normal use.

John C Cagle1, Krittika J D'Silva1, Brian J Hafner1, Daniel S Harrison1, Joan E Sanders2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic socks are expected to decrease in thickness and have reduced volume accommodation with normal use. It is unknown, however, to what degree they reduce in thickness over time.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine a correlation between the age of a prosthetic sock (defined as the out-of-package time) and the resulting change in thickness under standardized weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. STUDY
DESIGN: Experimental, mechanical assessment.
METHODS: Used prosthetic socks were donated by donors with transtibial amputation. Sock thickness was measured on a custom instrument under conditions representative of normal use. Stress-thickness response was compared to that of equivalent new socks to quantify the effects of use on sock performance.
RESULTS: Sock thickness changed non-linearly over time. On average, socks were 75% ± 17% of their initial thickness after 1 month, while socks older than 1 month were 72% ± 18% of their initial thickness. The elasticity of socks did not change with age.
CONCLUSION: The volume accommodation provided by used socks cannot be reliably predicted by ply or age. Direct measurement of total sock thickness may provide meaningful insight to quantify prosthetic users' socket fit and guide volume accommodation recommendations. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The mean difference in thickness between 3-ply and 5-ply used socks was equal to the standard deviation of each ply group (0.3mm). Therefore, it is possible that a 3-ply sock worn for as a little as 1 month could have a greater thickness than a 5-ply sock worn for a month. © The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prosthetic socks; limb management; prosthetic fit; volume accommodation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733408      PMCID: PMC4558393          DOI: 10.1177/0309364614568412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int        ISSN: 0309-3646            Impact factor:   1.895


  6 in total

1.  Effects of changes in cadence, prosthetic componentry, and time on interface pressures and shear stresses of three trans-tibial amputees.

Authors:  J E Sanders; S G Zachariah; A B Baker; J M Greve; C Clinton
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Standing interface stresses as a predictor of walking interface stresses in the trans-tibial prosthesis.

Authors:  S G Zachariah; J E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Prosthetic intervention effects on activity of lower-extremity amputees.

Authors:  Glenn K Klute; Jocelyn S Berge; Michael S Orendurff; Rhonda M Williams; Joseph M Czerniecki
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Interface pressures and shear stresses at thirteen socket sites on two persons with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  J E Sanders; D Lam; A J Dralle; R Okumura
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1997-01

5.  Amputee socks: how does sock ply relate to sock thickness?

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; John C Cagle; Daniel S Harrison; Ari Karchin
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Self-reported prosthetic sock use among persons with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Krittika D'Silva; Brian J Hafner; Katheryn J Allyn; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 1.895

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  A finite element model to assess transtibial prosthetic sockets with elastomeric liners.

Authors:  John C Cagle; Per G Reinhall; Kate J Allyn; Jake McLean; Paul Hinrichs; Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Effects of socket size on metrics of socket fit in trans-tibial prosthesis users.

Authors:  Joan E Sanders; Robert T Youngblood; Brian J Hafner; John C Cagle; Jake B McLean; Christian B Redd; Colin R Dietrich; Marcia A Ciol; Katheryn J Allyn
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.242

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.