Literature DB >> 19173411

Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Dennis McFadden1, Glen K Martin, Barden B Stagner, Mindy M Maloney.   

Abstract

Although several studies have documented the existence of sex differences in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) and transient-evoked OAEs (TEOAEs) in humans, less has been published about sex differences in distortion-product OAEs (DPOAEs). Estimates of sex and ear differences were extracted from a data set of OAE measurements previously collected for other purposes. In accord with past findings, the sex differences for TEOAEs were substantial for both narrowband and wideband measures. By contrast, the sex differences for DPOAEs were about half the size of those for TEOAEs. In this sample, the ear differences were small for TEOAEs in both sexes and absent for DPOAEs. One implication is that the cochlear mechanisms underlying DPOAEs appear to be less susceptible to whatever influences are responsible for producing sex differences in TEOAEs and SOAEs in humans. We discuss the possibility that differences in the effective level of the stimuli may contribute to these outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19173411      PMCID: PMC2649658          DOI: 10.1121/1.3037231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  61 in total

1.  Additional findings on heritability and prenatal masculinization of cochlear mechanisms: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  D McFadden; J C Loehlin; E G Pasanen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 2.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.

Authors:  C A Shera; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Individual differences and the reliability of 2F1-F2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: effects of time-of-day, stimulus variables, and gender.

Authors:  A T Cacace; W A McClelland; J Weiner; D J McFarland
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1996-12

4.  Longitudinal measurements of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in infants.

Authors:  E M Burns; S L Campbell; K H Arehart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates: prevalence and gender effects.

Authors:  T Morlet; A Lapillonne; C Ferber; R Duclaux; L Sann; G Putet; B Salle; L Collet
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Development of cochlear active mechanisms in humans differs between gender.

Authors:  T Morlet; E Perrin; J D Durrant; A Lapillonne; C Ferber; R Duclaux; G Putet; L Collet
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Otoacoustic emissions and tympanometry in a general adult population in Sweden.

Authors:  Magnus S K Johansson; Stig D Arlinger
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Peripheral auditory asymmetry in infantile autism.

Authors:  S Khalfa; N Bruneau; B Rogé; N Georgieff; E Veuillet; J L Adrien; C Barthélémy; L Collet
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Incidence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in children and infants.

Authors:  E A Strickland; E M Burns; A Tubis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  16 in total

1.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 8.606

3.  Serum PCB concentrations and cochlear function in 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Tomás Trnovec; Eva Sovcíková; Gabriela Pavlovcinová; Janka Jakubíková; Todd A Jusko; Milan Husták; Dana Jurecková; L'ubica Palkovicová; Anton Kocan; Beata Drobná; Kinga Lancz; Sona Wimmerová
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Correlations between otoacoustic emissions and performance in common psychoacoustical tasks.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Differences in common psychoacoustical tasks by sex, menstrual cycle, and race.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Mindy M Maloney; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle H Pho
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sex differences in auditory subcortical function.

Authors:  Jennifer Krizman; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 7.  Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Dissociation between distortion-product and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Estrogenic modulation of auditory processing: a vertebrate comparison.

Authors:  Melissa L Caras
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 8.606

10.  Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.587

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.