Literature DB >> 18164883

Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing.

Christopher W Turner1, Lina A J Reiss, Bruce J Gantz.   

Abstract

The topic of this review is the strategy of preserving residual acoustic hearing in the implanted ear to provide combined electrical stimulation and acoustic hearing as a rehabilitative strategy for sensorineural hearing loss. This chapter will concentrate on research done with the Iowa/Nucleus 10 mm Hybrid device, but we will also attempt to summarize strategies and results from other groups around the world who use slightly different approaches. A number of studies have shown that preserving residual acoustic hearing in the implanted ear is a realistic goal for many patients with severe high-frequency hearing loss. The addition of the electric stimulation to their existing acoustic hearing can provide increased speech recognition for these patients. In addition, the preserved acoustic hearing can offer considerable advantages, as compared to a traditional cochlear implant, for tasks such as speech recognition in backgrounds or appreciation of music and other situations where the poor frequency resolution of electric stimulation has been a disadvantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18164883      PMCID: PMC2593157          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  51 in total

1.  Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.

Authors:  D A Vickers; B C Moore; T Baer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Features of stimulation affecting tonal-speech perception: implications for cochlear prostheses.

Authors:  Li Xu; Yuhjung Tsai; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Hearing loss and the limits of amplification.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Evaluation of the temporal bones of a multichannel cochlear implant patient.

Authors:  J J Zappia; J K Niparko; D L Oviatt; J L Kemink; R A Altschuler
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Effects of noise and spectral resolution on vowel and consonant recognition: acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Q J Fu; R V Shannon; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves.

Authors:  M C Liberman; L W Dodds
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Stability of low-frequency residual hearing in patients who are candidates for combined acoustic plus electric hearing.

Authors:  Wai Na Yao; Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.

Authors:  Shu-Chen Peng; J Bruce Tomblin; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Reimplantation of hybrid cochlear implant users with a full-length electrode after loss of residual hearing.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Elad Sagi; Michael Jackson; William H Shapiro; J Thomas Roland; Susan B Waltzman; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  C A Hogan; C W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  49 in total

1.  Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Camille Dunn; Jacob Oleson; Marlan Hansen; Aaron Parkinson; Christopher Turner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Effects of Removing Low-Frequency Electric Information on Speech Perception With Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Jennifer R Fowler; Jessica L Eggleston; Kelly M Reavis; Garnett P McMillan; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2009-06

4.  Non-uniform distribution of outer hair cell transmembrane potential induced by extracellular electric field.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Teresa M Wilson; Tao Wu; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Automated insertion of preformed cochlear implant electrodes: evaluation of curling behaviour and insertion forces on an artificial cochlear model.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Andreas Hussong; Martin Leinung; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 6.  Regenerating cochlear hair cells: quo vadis stem cell.

Authors:  Kirk Beisel; Laura Hansen; Garrett Soukup; Bernd Fritzsch
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 5.249

7.  Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Gina L Su; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-10

Review 8.  Drug delivery for treatment of inner ear disease: current state of knowledge.

Authors:  Andrew A McCall; Erin E Leary Swan; Jeffrey T Borenstein; William F Sewell; Sharon G Kujawa; Michael J McKenna
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Ganglion cell and 'dendrite' populations in electric acoustic stimulation ears.

Authors:  Helge Rask-Andersen; Wei Liu; Fred Linthicum
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

10.  Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Ann Perreau; Bruce Gantz; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.