Literature DB >> 19923242

Auditory temporal acuity probed with cochlear implant stimulation and cortical recording.

Alana E Kirby1, John C Middlebrooks.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants stimulate the auditory nerve with amplitude-modulated (AM) electric pulse trains. Pulse rates >2,000 pulses per second (pps) have been hypothesized to enhance transmission of temporal information. Recent studies, however, have shown that higher pulse rates impair phase locking to sinusoidal AM in the auditory cortex and impair perceptual modulation detection. Here, we investigated the effects of high pulse rates on the temporal acuity of transmission of pulse trains to the auditory cortex. In anesthetized guinea pigs, signal-detection analysis was used to measure the thresholds for detection of gaps in pulse trains at rates of 254, 1,017, and 4,069 pps and in acoustic noise. Gap-detection thresholds decreased by an order of magnitude with increases in pulse rate from 254 to 4,069 pps. Such a pulse-rate dependence would likely influence speech reception through clinical speech processors. To elucidate the neural mechanisms of gap detection, we measured recovery from forward masking after a 196.6-ms pulse train. Recovery from masking was faster at higher carrier pulse rates and masking increased linearly with current level. We fit the data with a dual-exponential recovery function, consistent with a peripheral and a more central process. High-rate pulse trains evoked less central masking, possibly due to adaptation of the response in the auditory nerve. Neither gap detection nor forward masking varied with cortical depth, indicating that these processes are likely subcortical. These results indicate that gap detection and modulation detection are mediated by two separate neural mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19923242      PMCID: PMC2807213          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00794.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  35 in total

1.  Neural responses to the onset of voicing are unrelated to other measures of temporal resolution.

Authors:  D G Sinex; G D Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Effects of masker frequency and duration in forward masking: further evidence for the influence of peripheral nonlinearity.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; C J Plack
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Psychophysical recovery from single-pulse forward masking in electric hearing.

Authors:  D A Nelson; G S Donaldson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Psychophysical recovery from pulse-train forward masking in electric hearing.

Authors:  David A Nelson; Gail S Donaldson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Representation of auditory space by cortical neurons in awake cats.

Authors:  Brian J Mickey; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Effects of cochlear-implant pulse rate and inter-channel timing on channel interactions and thresholds.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Within- and between-channel gap detection in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Antje Heinrich; Claude Alain; Bruce A Schneider
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: within-channel and across-channel conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Nathan D Maxfield; Gabriel J Pitt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Functional anatomy of the inferior colliculus and the auditory cortex: current source density analyses of click-evoked potentials.

Authors:  P Müller-Preuss; U Mitzdorf
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-09-16       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  23 in total

1.  Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: Spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; Steven M Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter.

Authors:  Kenneth E Hancock; Yoojin Chung; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Behavioral training enhances cortical temporal processing in neonatally deafened juvenile cats.

Authors:  Ralph E Beitel; Maike Vollmer; Marcia W Raggio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Predicting Speech Recognition Using the Speech Intelligibility Index and Other Variables for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Sungmin Lee; Lisa Lucks Mendel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Recovery from forward masking in cochlear implant listeners depends on stimulation mode, level, and electrode location.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Aditya M Kulkarni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal-pitch sensitivity in electric hearing with amplitude modulation and inserted pulses with short inter-pulse intervals.

Authors:  Martin J Lindenbeck; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Sridhar Srinivasan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Silicone-coated thin film array cochlear implantation in a feline model.

Authors:  Jessica M Van Beek-King; Pamela T Bhatti; David Blake; Jonathan Crawford; Brian J McKinnon
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Forward masking estimated by signal detection theory analysis of neuronal responses in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ana Alves-Pinto; Sylvie Baudoux; Alan R Palmer; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-04-06

9.  Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.

Authors:  Shuman He; Bahar S Shahsavarani; Tyler C McFayden; Haibo Wang; Katherine E Gill; Lei Xu; Xiuhua Chao; Jianfen Luo; Ruijie Wang; Nancy He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Rat primary auditory cortex is tuned exclusively to the contralateral hemifield.

Authors:  Justin D Yao; Peter Bremen; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.