Literature DB >> 17552685

Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents.

Alexander A Doinikov1, Paul A Dayton.   

Abstract

The present paper proposes a model that describes the encapsulation of microbubble contrast agents by the linear Maxwell constitutive equation. The model also incorporates the translational motion of contrast agent microbubbles and takes into account radiation losses due to the compressibility of the surrounding liquid. To establish physical features of the proposed model, comparative analysis is performed between this model and two existing models, one of which treats the encapsulation as a viscoelastic solid following the Kelvin-Voigt constitutive equation and the other assumes that the encapsulating layer behaves as a viscous Newtonian fluid. Resonance frequencies, damping coefficients, and scattering cross sections for the three shell models are compared in the regime of linear oscillation. Translational displacements predicted by the three shell models are examined by numerically calculating the general, nonlinearized equations of motion for weakly nonlinear excitation. Analogous results for free bubbles are also presented as a basis to which calculations made for encapsulated bubbles can be related. It is shown that the Maxwell shell model possesses specific physical features that are unavailable in the two other models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17552685      PMCID: PMC3092912          DOI: 10.1121/1.2722233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Paul A Dayton; John S Allen; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Dhiman Chatterjee; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

5.  Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation.

Authors:  Kausik Sarkar; William T Shi; Dhiman Chatterjee; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents.

Authors:  P A Dayton; K E Morgan; A L Klibanov; G H Brandenburger; K W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles.

Authors:  P J Frinking; N de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of an encapsulated gas bubble in an ultrasound field.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Ultrasound scattering properties of Albunex microspheres.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Lateral phase separation in lipid-coated microbubbles.

Authors:  Mark A Borden; Gary V Martinez; Josette Ricker; Nelly Tsvetkova; Marjorie Longo; Robert J Gillies; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.882

View more
  13 in total

1.  Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: strain-softening interfacial elasticity model.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar; Dhiman Chatterjee; William T Shi; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An iterative fullwave simulation approach to multiple scattering in media with randomly distributed microbubbles.

Authors:  Aditya Joshi; Brooks D Lindsey; Paul A Dayton; Gianmarco Pinton; Marie Muller
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  The use of microbubbles in Doppler ultrasound studies.

Authors:  Piero Tortoli; Francesco Guidi; Riccardo Mori; Hendrik J Vos
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Jillian F Haac; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  Wave scattering from encapsulated microbubbles subject to high-frequency ultrasound: contribution of higher-order scattering modes.

Authors:  Jiusheng Chen; Kendall S Hunter; Robin Shandas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comparison between maximum radial expansion of ultrasound contrast agents and experimental postexcitation signal results.

Authors:  Daniel A King; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Encapsulated microbubbles and echogenic liposomes for contrast ultrasound imaging and targeted drug delivery.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Rahul Nahire; Sanku Mallik; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Comput Mech       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Modeling of the acoustic response from contrast agent microbubbles near a rigid wall.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Shukui Zhao; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Resonance frequencies of lipid-shelled microbubbles in the regime of nonlinear oscillations.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Jillian F Haac; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.890

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.