Literature DB >> 25935932

Correlation of rupture dynamics to the nonlinear backscatter response from polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.

Sujeethraj Koppolu, Parag V Chitnis, Jonathan Mamou, John S Allen, Jeffrey A Ketterling.   

Abstract

Polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) may expel their encapsulated gas subject to ultrasound-induced shell buckling or rupture. Nonlinear oscillations of this gas bubble can produce a subharmonic component in the ultrasound backscatter. This study investigated the relationship between this gas-release mechanism and shell-thickness-to-radius ratios (STRRs) of polymer-shelled UCAs. Three types of polylactide-shelled UCAs with STRRs of 7.5, 40, and 100 nm/μm were studied. Each UCA population had a nominal mean diameter of 2 μm. UCAs were subjected to increasing static overpressure ranging from 2 to 330 kPa over a duration of 2 h in a custom-designed test chamber while being imaged using a 200× magnification video microscope at a frame rate of 5 frames/s. Digitized video images were binarized and processed to obtain the cross-sectional area of individual UCAs. Integration of the normalized cross-sectional area over normalized time, defined as buckling factor (Bf), provided a dimensionless parameter for quantifying and comparing the degree of pre-rupture buckling exhibited by the UCAs of different STRRs in response to overpressure. The UCAs with an STRR of 7.5 nm/μm exhibited a distinct shell-buckling phase before shell rupture (Bf < 1), whereas the UCAs with higher STRRs (40 and 100 nm/μm) did not undergo significant prerupture buckling (Bf ≈ 1). The difference in the overpressure response was correlated with the subharmonic response produced by these UCAs. When excited using 20-MHz ultrasound, individual UCAs (N = 3000) in populations that did not exhibit a buckling phase produced a subharmonic response that was an order of magnitude greater than the UCA population with a prominent pre-rupture buckling phase. These results indicate the mechanism of gas expulsion from these UCAs might be a relevant factor in determining the level of subharmonic response in response to high-frequency ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25935932      PMCID: PMC4998738          DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2014.006828

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  23 in total

1.  Optical imaging of contrast agent microbubbles in an ultrasound field with a 100-MHz camera.

Authors:  N de Jong; P J Frinking; A Bouakaz; M Goorden; T Schourmans; X Jingping; F Mastik
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Influence of microbubble shell properties on ultrasound signal: Implications for low-power perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Howard Leong-Poi; Ji Song; Se-Joong Rim; Jonathan Christiansen; Sanjiv Kaul; Jonathan R Lindner
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.251

3.  The behaviour of individual contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  V Sboros; C M Moran; S D Pye; W N McDicken
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Nonlinear intravascular ultrasound contrast imaging.

Authors:  David E Goertz; Martijn E Frijlink; Nico de Jong; Antonius F W van der Steen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  "Compression-only" behavior of phospholipid-coated contrast bubbles.

Authors:  Nico de Jong; Marcia Emmer; Chien Ting Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Frits Mastik; Detlef Lohse; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Buckling resistance of solid shell bubbles under ultrasound.

Authors:  Philippe Marmottant; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Catherine Quilliet
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Rupture threshold characterization of polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents subjected to static overpressure.

Authors:  Parag V Chitnis; Paul Lee; Jonathan Mamou; John S Allen; Marcel Böhmer; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  J Appl Phys       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 8.  Ultrasound contrast agents: a review.

Authors:  B B Goldberg; J B Liu; F Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Effects of acoustic insonation parameters on ultrasound contrast agent destruction.

Authors:  Chih-Kuang Yeh; Shin-Yuan Su
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Influence of shell properties on high-frequency ultrasound imaging and drug delivery using polymer-shelled microbubbles.

Authors:  Parag V Chitnis; Sujeethraj Koppolu; Jonathan Mamou; Ceciel Chlon; Jeffrey A Ketterling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.