Literature DB >> 18990417

Modeling of nonlinear viscous stress in encapsulating shells of lipid-coated contrast agent microbubbles.

Alexander A Doinikov1, Jillian F Haac, Paul A Dayton.   

Abstract

A general theoretical approach to the development of zero-thickness encapsulation models for contrast microbubbles is proposed. The approach describes a procedure that allows one to recast available rheological laws from the bulk form to a surface form which is used in a modified Rayleigh-Plesset equation governing the radial dynamics of a contrast microbubble. By the use of the proposed procedure, the testing of different rheological laws for encapsulation can be carried out. Challenges of existing shell models for lipid-encapsulated microbubbles, such as the dependence of shell parameters on the initial bubble radius and the "compression-only" behavior, are discussed. Analysis of the rheological behavior of lipid encapsulation is made by using experimental radius-time curves for lipid-coated microbubbles with radii in the range 1.2-2.5 microm. The curves were acquired for a research phospholipid-coated contrast agent insonified with a 20 cycle, 3.0 MHz, 100 kPa acoustic pulse. The fitting of the experimental data by a model which treats the shell as a viscoelastic solid gives the values of the shell surface viscosity increasing from 0.30 x 10(-8) kg/s to 2.63 x 10(-8) kg/s for the range of bubble radii, indicated above. The shell surface elastic modulus increases from 0.054 N/m to 0.37 N/m. It is proposed that this increase may be a result of the lipid coating possessing the properties of both a shear-thinning and a strain-softening material. We hypothesize that these complicated rheological properties do not allow the existing shell models to satisfactorily describe the dynamics of lipid encapsulation. In the existing shell models, the viscous and the elastic shell terms have the linear form which assumes that the viscous and the elastic stresses acting inside the lipid shell are proportional to the shell shear rate and the shell strain, respectively, with constant coefficients of proportionality. The analysis performed in the present paper suggests that a more general, nonlinear theory may be more appropriate. It is shown that the use of the nonlinear theory for shell viscosity allows one to model the "compression-only" behavior. As an example, the results of the simulation for a 2.03 microm radius bubble insonified with a 6 cycle, 1.8 MHz, 100 kPa acoustic pulse are given. These parameters correspond to the acoustic conditions under which the "compression-only" behavior was observed by de Jong et al. [Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33 (2007) 653-656]. It is also shown that the use of the Cross law for the modeling of the shear-thinning behavior of shell viscosity reduces the variance of experimentally estimated values of the shell viscosity and its dependence on the initial bubble radius.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18990417      PMCID: PMC2826140          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  16 in total

1.  Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Radiation-force assisted targeting facilitates ultrasonic molecular imaging.

Authors:  Shukui Zhao; Mark Borden; Susannah H Bloch; Dustin Kruse; Katherine W Ferrara; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.488

3.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements.

Authors:  N de Jong; L Hoff; T Skotland; N Bom
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Characterization of ultrasound contrast microbubbles using in vitro experiments and viscous and viscoelastic interface models for encapsulation.

Authors:  Kausik Sarkar; William T Shi; Dhiman Chatterjee; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  "Compression-only" behavior of phospholipid-coated contrast bubbles.

Authors:  Nico de Jong; Marcia Emmer; Chien Ting Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Frits Mastik; Detlef Lohse; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sander M van der Meer; Benjamin Dollet; Marco M Voormolen; Chien T Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The onset of microbubble vibration.

Authors:  Marcia Emmer; Annemieke van Wamel; Dave E Goertz; Nico de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Acoustic modeling of shell-encapsulated gas bubbles.

Authors:  P J Frinking; N de Jong
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of an encapsulated gas bubble in an ultrasound field.

Authors:  Alexander A Doinikov; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  21 in total

1.  Excitation threshold for subharmonic generation from contrast microbubbles.

Authors:  Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Model for bubble pulsation in liquid between parallel viscoelastic layers.

Authors:  Todd A Hay; Yurii A Ilinskii; Evgenia A Zabolotskaya; Mark F Hamilton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Material characterization of the encapsulation of an ultrasound contrast microbubble and its subharmonic response: strain-softening interfacial elasticity model.

Authors:  Shirshendu Paul; Amit Katiyar; Kausik Sarkar; Dhiman Chatterjee; William T Shi; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Cell mechanics in biomedical cavitation.

Authors:  Qianxi Wang; Kawa Manmi; Kuo-Kang Liu
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Model for the dynamics of a spherical bubble undergoing small shape oscillations between parallel soft elastic layers.

Authors:  Todd A Hay; Yurii A Ilinskii; Evgenia A Zabolotskaya; Mark F Hamilton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Estimating the shell parameters of SonoVue microbubbles using light scattering.

Authors:  Juan Tu; Jingfeng Guan; Yuanyuan Qiu; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Wave scattering from encapsulated microbubbles subject to high-frequency ultrasound: contribution of higher-order scattering modes.

Authors:  Jiusheng Chen; Kendall S Hunter; Robin Shandas
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Production of uniformly sized serum albumin and dextrose microbubbles.

Authors:  Michael J Borrelli; William D O'Brien; Laura J Bernock; Heather R Williams; Eric Hamilton; Jonah Wu; Michael L Oelze; William C Culp
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 7.491

9.  Comparison between maximum radial expansion of ultrasound contrast agents and experimental postexcitation signal results.

Authors:  Daniel A King; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Impulse response method for characterization of echogenic liposomes.

Authors:  Jason L Raymond; Ying Luan; Tom van Rooij; Klazina Kooiman; Shao-Ling Huang; David D McPherson; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong; Christy K Holland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.